Skip to content

On Dramatic Action: Playing Karate

I’ve got a nephew with Sensory Deprivation Disorder. It’s an uncommon phenomenon, and a strange one at that. Basically (as I understand it), his body has trouble recognizing the physical impact of his environment.

That kinda sounds like the making of a sci-fi novel, or like some dreadful problem. It’s really not that bad. His sense of touch works just fine, but his brain has trouble…okay, I’m going to stop trying to explain it. What do I know about brain disorders?

Here’s the point I’m getting at. Around the time my daughter was one, my Mom started telling a story about a big breakthrough my sister and brother-in-law had had with this nephew. When he was first diagnosed with the disorder, the doctor’s recommended “high-impact” playing.

In other words, just before bedtime, my brother-in-law would wrestle with his son. With most kids, that would just get them all riled up and make bedtime a nightmare. With my nephew, it helped him feel normal. The rough contact comforted him, and helped him settle down, helped him focus.

I thought a lot about that story. And I thought about lion cubs — or, to be quite perfectly honest, about the lion cubs in The Lion King, but I’m pretty sure those guys did their research. I thought about babies of all species wrestling with their parents. And even without Sensory Deprivation Disorder, I think that’s got to be a comforting feeling.

As parents we’re bigger. We’re stronger. We’re in control. And we spend a lot of time trying to teach our kids that while still being tender, and soft, and gentle. Hearing that story about my nephew, though, inspired me to start playing a little rougher with my daughter.

It horrified Trish, the first time Annabelle came crawling across the room toward me and I knocked her over onto her back. Annabelle squealed with delight, though. I loomed over her, and then (very, very carefully) leaned down to pin her against the floor and rumbled, “Squiiiiish!”

She squirmed and wrestled (and laughed and smiled), and then I pulled away and she screamed for more. It became a regular game for us, and as soon as she started walking I added tripping to the game. I’d squish her for a moment, let her escape, let her get two or three steps away (and picking up speed), then lunge out and grab her ankles.

She’d go crashing to the floor, Trish would gasp in shock, and Annabelle would laugh and laugh as I leaned forward to squish her all over again. It’s still one of her favorite games.

These days she’s bigger, though. She’s grown up, and learned some new skills. She’s been paying attention — to the movies I watch, to the games I play — and I can still remember the day she said, “Daddy, what did you just do to that guy?”

“What guy?” I asked, closing the lid to my monitor.

“The monster guy.”

I thought about it for a moment, and then said, “I knocked him down.” She’d seen that much, anyway. “He was hurting some people, and they asked me to help, so I knocked him down and told him to go away.”

She nodded, accepted that as answer enough, and went on with her day. About half an hour later, I got up to go get a drink from the kitchen, and found her blocking my way.

I blinked at her. “What are you doing?”

She screwed up her face in her best imitation of scary, and said, “I’m gonna knock you down.”

I squared up in front of her, arched an eyebrow menacingly, and said, “Bring it!”

Needless to say, she didn’t have what it took to bring me down. I let her try for a while, then I showed her how it was done. Then I spent the next half hour teaching her karate. That’s our game now. We still play squish from time to time, but we’ve moved up to karate.

She knows how to throw a punch, how to kick, and how to block. She’s got a decent stance, and she can throw an elbow like you wouldn’t believe.

Anytime, without warning, I can aim a punch at her midsection (albeit a slow one) and her first response is to block it. Her second, most of the time, is to say demurely, “No, Dad. We’re not playing karate now. We’re princesses.”

Still, when she feels like fighting, nothing beats karate. Or…it hasn’t yet, anyway. But that may be changing. Last Saturday I was setting up for the photoshoot for my next novel, bringing in props from the car, and she looked up from a puzzle on the coffee table as I came in.

Her eyes lit up, and she jumped to her feet. “Ooh, yay!” she said. “You got a gun! Can I have it?”

On Reader Expectations: Carpe Demon and The Second Opinion

Yesterday I talked about some of the things I learned about reader expectations in my Category Fiction class. By way of example, I mentioned some techniques for building suspense in Thriller novels.

There was more, though. To my horror, I realized after six months of promoting my suspense series as a Thriller that it’s a Mystery/Thriller hybrid at best, but really it’s much closer to a Mystery than I would have guessed.

Understanding Your Category

That matters. That matters in a big way, because one of the main things we saw in this class is the strong differentiation between categories, and that differentiation creates (and is created by) reader expectations that can ultimately determine the success of a book.

It doesn’t matter how good a Mystery is. If you put it in the hands of a reader who only likes Thrillers and the book flops as a Thriller, the reader isn’t going to like it.

I experienced that firsthand with Women’s Fiction (where I liked First Lady better than The Cinderella Deal only because I don’t like the Romance stuff that The Cinderella Deal got right), and I kept encountering it again throughout the semester. The two times it most stuck out to me were with Carpe Demon and The Second Opinion.

Carpe Demon by Julie Kenner is an urban fantasy novel aimed with pinpoint accuracy at a target market of suburban soccer moms. It hits home — the series is surprisingly successful — but as a fan of traditional fantasy (and not a soccer mom), I found its popularity baffling.

The book constantly refuses to tell the fantasy tale, focusing insistently on a more mundane story at every step of the way. That was a huge drawback for me, but the “soccer mom” aspect of the story is precisely what appeals to most of the book’s audience. The author understands her readers’ expectations and writes directly to them.

Writing What They Want

Michael Palmer does the same thing in The Second Opinion, creating a perfect illustration of a point our professor offered in her lecture on the topic of Medical Thrillers: the educated readers of these books are usually far more interested in realistic, intriguing medical scenarios than in elegant prose.

Written by a practicing doctor, Second Opinion shows that principle in perfect clarity. It features a protagonist with Asperger’s Syndrome, a victim with the horrific Locked-In Syndrome, and villains taking advantage of a high-tech hospital’s government-mandated transition to electronic medical records to create a twisted, driving plot.

Meanwhile the characters are flat and unlikable, the frequent exposition is dry and tedious, and the storytelling is downright clumsy. That doesn’t stop the book selling, though, because the writer does exactly what his readers expect of him: he writes a gripping Medical Thriller.

That’s something I need to understand and internalize in my own writing — stop trying to write the universally perfect book, stop giving myself so much credit for academic style, and actually write a book that will work with a real-world audience.

What about you? Do you know your category? Are you writing to it? If not, what do you need to do to fix that?

(Once again, I really wouldn’t recommend buying either of those books, but just in case you decide to disregard my advice, the links above are all affiliate links. That way at least some good will come of your misguided choices.)

On Reader Expectations: Genre Conventions

Last week I started reviewing some of the novels we read in my Category Fiction class with a pretty brutal panning of our Women’s Fiction samples. Along the way, I mentioned a startling similarity in their plots — not just in those two books, but in all Women’s Fiction novels.

I was genuinely surprised to learn about some of the expectations Women’s Fiction readers bring to the genre. When the professor spelled out the required plot structure in stark detail, it rang shallow and soulless, but that’s the world’s most profitable category by far. They’re clearly doing something right.

Catering to Reader Expectations

That “something” is simple enough, too: they’re catering to reader expectations. When that’s done poorly we sometimes call it “pandering,” (and I called it that in at least one of my papers for the class), but the rest of the time we call it by a more generous name: audience analysis.

That’s something I’ve talked about often. It’s something I recommend to every new writer I talk with, and it’s critical to any kind of effective communication.

A good writer absolutely must spend some time considering where his or her readers are coming from, understand what expectations readers bring with them to the book, and write with those expectations in mind.

Practicing What I Preach

As I said, that’s a principle I preach pretty vociferously, but this course was an education in just how little I practice it. Every book I picked up opened my eyes to unexpected reader expectations concerning at least one of my active writing projects.

I’m not writing any romance novels (and wouldn’t even consider trying), but studying Women’s Fiction shed remarkable light on the romantic subplots I’m deliberately weaving through all four of my series in progress.

In the same way, listing out the specific elements that create tension in mysteries and thrillers — and discussing in class why readers respond to those the way they do — offered a ton of insight for my own suspense novels.

What I Learned about Writing This Week…from Mark Twain

Faking It

Dearest inklings, I come to you today with a heavy heart. I have a confession to make.

For someone with an English degree, my experience with classic English literature is rather abominable.

You know how we speak of someone’s being well-read? In some circles, I’d be the opposite of that: terribly-read. I can cite you some fantastic German literature as proof of my being not wholly ignorant (Goethe, anyone?) — but then I grew up in Germany, so that’s kind of to be expected. Somehow, though, I managed to get all the way to the college graduate level without having read most of the books American students tend to read in high school.

Oh, I can hold forth on plot and character of a great many classics: Captains Courageous, Oliver Twist, Ben Hur, Moby Dick… I can converse on these so convincingly, you’ll come away from our tête-à-tête thinking I’m all sorts of brilliantly literate. You won’t know that when it comes to classic literature, I’m kind of a fake.

Getting Caught

How did I become such a convincing fake? Well, that’s easy: I read ’em all as a kid — the abridged versions. All the important characters and plot points a kid would glom onto — with very little of the nuance and artistry an adult would appreciate. And thus, I know just enough to make you all think I’m one of these amazing classic literature guru-type people.

Sometimes, though, I get caught. At a recent writers meeting (mayhap the NaNoWriMo End Party, I can’t remember), somebody said something about the classic novel The Prince and the Pauper. I tossed in the remark, “Oh, by Charles Dickens.”

Jessie, sitting across from me, cocked her head and frowned. “No…Mark Twain wrote that.”

Googling ensued. To my dismay, Jessie was right. Me, I had to own up to being a fake. There’s nothing like swallowing your literary pride in front of a group of people who know enough to catch you out!

Getting Real

So, considering that my experience with Twain’s novel was 20 years in the past, I decided it was high time to take the first step in Faker’s Anonymous recovery. (Not so anonymous now.) I decided to read The Prince and the Pauper.

It was a romp. From start to finish, I found it engaging, heart-breaking, heart-warming, charming, amusing, infuriating (at the social injustice Twain highlights), and endearing. I was engrossed by how Twain wove history into his fiction, as I’ve always held a particular fascination for Henry VIII, his wives, and his children. (One of my first collegiate-level thesis papers was on Catherine of Aragon, Bloody Mary, and Elizabeth I.) Most of the plot came back to me as I read, and I was delighted to find that the abridged novel of my childhood stayed fairly true to the original book. But now I was getting it all in Twain’s voice, and it was delightful.

Getting Mad

Then I read the afterword, penned by someone named R. L. Fisher in 1988. This person (of whose gender I am unaware, so I can’t use “Mr.” or “Ms.”) calls the novel inferior and flat-out states that “Twain ignored his conscience” for not turning the novel into a scathing condemnation of the Tudor-era ruling class. Though Fisher claims to have enjoyed the novel, the afterword leaves no doubt of the reviewer’s displeasure over Twain’s goal to write nothing more than an “entertainment.”

I came away from that afterword irritated, my enjoyment of the story slightly tarnished. I won’t say Fisher ruined the story for me…but the childish joy I experienced in my reading of the novel has definitely faded a little.

It just goes to show that the old adage is true: You just can’t make everybody happy. No matter what you write, somebody’s going to criticize it. If you write something socially significant, someone’s going to say they’re offended. If you write to entertain, someone else will call you shallow. If you try to strike a balance, they’ll call you wishy-washy and ignore you until you slink away.

My solution? Just write the story. We talk a lot at Unstressed Syllables about paying attention to what readers need…but that’s more about good storycraft than it is a guideline for what atmosphere you should give the tale. Twain made his story fun. Sad in some parts, shocking in others — but all together, fun. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that. The tale called him to tell it that way. So he did.

I guess it comes down to where your loyalties as an artist lie. Will you sell out to popular opinion? (And is that prostituting your story? And is that being a fake?) Or will you stay true to who the characters are and to what the story wants to be, no matter what anyone else thinks?

Getting It

In this reading adventure, I started out as a fake and ended up with stronger convictions about sticking up for my stories. If I had to swallow a little pride to get a deeper taste of what it means to be a writer protective and jealous of her craft, I’d say it’s a fair trade.

And that’s WILAWriTWe.

On Reader Expectations: Las Vegas, NV

A couple weeks ago, Trish took the kids to Wichita for a weekend and left me home alone. And, no, I’m not talking about my lonely Christmas. This was a few weeks after that.

It was on the calendar as an opportunity for me to get some work. I tend to do that when Trish takes the kids away, whether it’s for the night or for a whole weekend. This time, I had two things on the schedule:

  • Pick up my friend Dan from the airport Saturday morning
  • And meet with my publication team all day Saturday to develop a publishing process

That left my free Saturday pretty booked up…but my Friday night was wide open. I was getting toward the end of my work day when I got a text message from Dan, who was at a convention in Las Vegas. It read:

Dude, hop a plane to Vegas tonight. I have a plan and need a grease man.

I laughed because, y’know, “hopping a plane to Vegas” isn’t the sort of thing I do. I sent him back my obligatory “lol,” then I packed up my stuff, headed out to my car, and pointed my way home while I tried to figure out what I was going to do with my evening.

Just then, a big ol’ Boeing took off right in front of me, curled gracefully through the air, and pushed its way out west. It wasn’t such a surprising sight — as I’ve said before, I write documentation for the FAA, which puts my workplace half a mile from the Will Rogers International Airport.

So while I watched that plane take off and wondered what I was going to do for dinner…I couldn’t help thinking, “Why not?”

I’d dropped him off for his flight out Wednesday, so I had a good guess there might be another going out in about half an hour. I popped over to the airport, pulled into the overnight parking, and headed toward the terminal to see how much this was going to cost.

Halfway to the door, I thought to call Dan. He picked up on the third ring, and said, “What?”

I asked, “How serious were you?”

“About robbing a casino and needing an accomplice?” he said. “None. None serious.”

“Well,” I said, “I was just thinking…I’d need to find out how much it costs to pick up a ticket last-minute, but I could come over for the evening, crash in your room tonight, and we could fly back tomorrow morning.”

He laughed, and it’s no surprise. Like I said, I’m not the adventurous sort. My night was wide open, though, and with all the crazy things I’m doing in my life these days (by which I mean “The Consortium”), hopping a plane to Vegas seemed almost reasonable.

He popped my bubble with one small correction, though. “I’m not flying back in the morning. I come back at nine tomorrow night.”

I stopped where I was, ten feet from the door to the airport. Couldn’t make it. I had an all-day publishing meeting scheduled for tomorrow. And then, standing there, I finally stopped to think through how much it would really cost. I couldn’t afford that! And how much hassle it would be to fly out tonight and fly back tomorrow.

And, really, how much would I get out of the trip? One evening in Vegas? I’d either get one really expensive dinner and then spend the rest of my time there sleeping, or I’d be absolutely wiped out for the next week. I’m not as young as I used to be.

So I turned around, went back to my car, and headed home. I watched the clock tick over, watched it pass the time I knew the plane would be taking off, and felt a deep sense of regret that I hadn’t at least gone those last ten feet and asked.

It’s kind of a sad story. It’s a missed opportunity. But it’s also fun in ways, because I really was that close to having an adventure, and until Dan told me it wouldn’t work, I barely even hesitated.

More than that…my all-day Saturday meeting was a blast. I worked with four amazing artists and we came up with a plan, we accomplished real things and set even bigger things in motion. It sounds like a downer ending — skipping the overnight jaunt to Vegas to spend a Saturday in work meetings — but it’s so much better than that.

My life is an adventure now. My new job’s boring old demands feel a lot more like a party, and my coworkers are some incredible new friends.

I’m playing against type. My life has become surprising, in every way, and I absolutely love it.

On Other People’s Books: The Cinderella Deal and First Lady

This month we’re talking about a Category Fiction class I took last fall, and some of the things I learned from reading eleven novels along the way. The novels, I should mention, were hand-picked by our professor.

She said she wanted us to see published books — successful books, many of them books with movie deals — that were still flawed. She wanted books where “the seams were showing,” and believe me, she found ’em.

Women’s Fiction

The first two books I wanted to talk about were her two selections for the category “Women’s Fiction,” which is a euphemism for “Romance Novels.” I already gave it away yesterday, but I didn’t like them.

Before I explain why, let me tell you a little bit about the books themselves. The Cinderella Deal by Jennifer Crusie is the story of a spunky leading lady who finds herself trapped in a life she doesn’t want. On an impulse, she escapes her drudgery for a brief fantasy vacation in a pretend life that more than makes up for the aggravation of sharing it with a fellow she doesn’t like too much.

Over time, she realizes not only that the loves the guy, but that she really could have this life. All it requires of her is a little sacrifice, and a little courage — and in exchange, she gets her happily-ever-after.

First Lady by Susan Elizabeth Phillips is, by contrast…well, it’s exactly the same thing. That’s not really much of a surprise in an industry that obsoletes it entire stock on a monthly basis. With that kind of churn, there’s bound to be some heavy repetition.

As a matter of fact, according to our lectures, that plot structure is virtually required in Women’s Fiction novels. That’s not to say they’re all carbon copies, though. In fact, the reading experiences between these two books were vastly different.

The Reader’s Experience

The Cinderella Deal made for a light, quick read. I didn’t like the book, but it was easy to read because it made a smooth path through the story. At every stage in the story, in every scene, the writer was doing precisely what the story structure called for.

First Lady, by contrast, faltered often. The hero and heroine were shallow caricatures at times, their flaws too superficial, and the conflicts between them often felt contrived. Worse, though, the child characters distracted from the love story. Or, rather, the love story distracted from the book.

First Lady doesn’t read like a romance novel, but like a really interesting travel novel interrupted by its own plot. I might not have noticed that if not for the contrast to a textbook-perfect romance story in The Cinderella Deal.

But in that context, it’s clear to see where one writer wrote to a category, and the other tried to shoehorn a category into a story that didn’t really match with it.

The lesson we need to take home is an easy one: write with your readers in mind. It’s not enough to just write the story the way it first occurs to you (which we’ve all come to terms with), and it’s not enough to just pack in the extra bits and pieces Writer’s Digest tells you will make it sell better.

At the end of the day, a novel is a medium for communication. I’ve been saying that of writing all along. If you want to get it right you have to consider your readers’ experience, and write for them. Write something that will be fun to read, regardless of the genre.

(I really wouldn’t recommend buying either of those books, but just in case you decide to disregard my advice, the links above are all affiliate links. That way at least some good will come of your misguided choices.)

On Other People’s Books: Wide Exposure

I started this week with a brief description of the Category Fiction class I took last fall. One of the big surprises in that story was how much I enjoyed the class.

The class’s merit wasn’t the only thing that caught me off-guard. I’d spent some time dreading all the driving I’d have to do, the scheduling necessary to work a Masters degree into my life…but it had somehow never occurred to me that I’d need to make time for homework.

Making Time to Read

The very first class period brought the reality crashing home, when the syllabus spelled out in dreadful detail the semester’s workload: three big papers, nine little papers, and (as I mentioned) eleven novels in need of reading.

That last one took me most by surprise. The papers didn’t worry me too much. I write all the time. It’s what I do.

The thought of reading a novel a week was more than a little intimidating, though. Over the course of the semester I ended up reading as many novels as I’d read in the previous six or seven years combined.

That’s a pretty dreadful statistic for a novelist. I’d justified it in a handful of ways, mainly by insisting that I spent every bit of reading time I could find on writing instead. I was also reviewing unfinished manuscripts (my own and others’), devouring short-form non-fiction by way of the internet, and maintaining a writing advice blog to help all the novice writers out there trying to find their voice.

With all that on my plate, it was a real challenge just to find time to read the new Pratchett novels when they came out one or two a year. Anything else was just impossible.

Didactic Literature

Of course, the class proved that completely wrong. It took an assignment — an imposed deadline — to drive to me to it, but even facing eleven books on a pretty rigorous schedule I never once had trouble finding the time to finish reading a novel that semester.  And that was on top of a schedule already crammed with the addition of my Master’s studies.

One of the most valuable lessons I learned (even if it is the most depressingly prosaic) was simply that I can make time to read on a regular basis. My other projects and responsibilities are no excuse to leave this aspect out of the pursuit of my art.

Without that kind of constant, wide exposure, everything else I do as a writer suffers. Nothing revealed that to me quite as clearly as two books I really disliked. Come back tomorrow, and I’ll tell you all about them.

What I Learned About Writing This Week…from Starting A New Blog

Blogging? Seriously?

A long time ago, in a cyberspace far, far away…

BLOGGING!

*ahem*  Pardon my geek moment.

Many moons ago — before Facebook became open to the general public, when “twitterpated” was still a Bambi and not a social networking reference, and before YouTube made movie stars out of all of us — I started a blog.

I don’t remember why I did it.  I don’t remember who told me I should do it.  I know I had a reason, and I know at least one person encouraged me into it.  It was just a lark, really, a hobby of sorts.  It was a place to record my thoughts and get feedback.  I plunged into writing my first post without giving it any real thought before I started.  I hadn’t the foggiest idea what I was doing.

But that was okay.  Because nobody else in my circle of blogging friends had a clue, either.  All of us were new to the concept, new enough that I had to go around explaining why this was called a “blog,” not just “online log” or “journal.”  Like I said, social networking was in its gestation stages and had yet to enter infancy.  We hardly knew how to link to each others’ blogs, much less make a significant impression on the general Internet world.

My blog became a catch-all.  It was my repository for random thoughts, rants, email forwards I actually found amusing, essays on my religious beliefs, book reviews, family news, work news, photos, ideas, questions, answers, challenges, and opinions.  I rarely filtered my types of posts; whatever I felt like writing and sharing, it went into the blog.  Concerning blogging, I adopted Robert A. Heinlein’s philosophy:  “Specialization is for insects.”

Fast-forward to yesterday, January 11, 2011.  As of 7:00 a.m. yesterday, I’ve officially launched a brand-spankin’ new blog.  I’ve spent the past month in intense, deliberate preparation. Nowadays, I know so much more about blogging than I did the first time around! I have more than six years’ worth of experience, and I’ve been a guest columnist at Unstressed Syllables for a year. I have an idea of what reaches readers, and I’ve given up my Heinleinian ways (in regard to blogging, anyway). In a feat of bloggerly strength, I’ve brought my accumulated knowledge to bear on getting this new blog ready to go. Let the oohing and ahhing begin!

As my launch day approached, I was antsy with excitement.  Monday night, I tweeted this:

I’m so excited to launch my new blog. I want tomorrow morning to be *now*! #blogging #networking #amwriting

I checked over a few details, then went to bed and did some relaxation exercises to make my mind calm down already.

So.  Yesterday morning, the blog launched.

And I spent the rest of the day tweaking.

URLs needed fixing.  URLs needed adding.  I had comment moderation enabled and didn’t know it.  My SexyBookmarks plugin malfunctioned.  According to my html, I had all my p’s correctly bracketed, but the paragraph breaks still weren’t showing properly.  On my “About” page, I’d written 2001 instead of 2011.

The blog still needs work — and yes, it’s the kind of work that probably ought to be finished before a blog goes live.  But I’m impatient…and besides, this’ll be a good challenge for me to provide extra-sparkly content so my readers don’t let my blog-baby’s messiness deter them from visiting!

Now, at the end of my blog’s first day out, I’m reflecting and pondering and drawing parallels.  Starting a new blog is suspiciously, hmmmm, like working on a novel.  You get it to the point where you’re ready to share your book-baby with other people — and as soon as you hand over the copy, you start paging through your original and say, “D’oh!  I needed to reword that sentence!  Split that paragraph!  Tighten up that dialogue!”

“Wait!” you want to cry to your beta reader.  “Give it back!  I wasn’t done yet!”

But that, my dear inklings, is the truth that’s so hard for so many of us to accept:  We’re never done.

There’s always something to change.  There’s always something to fix.  As we practice our craft — and hopefully hone our skills — we become more aware of past mistakes.  We look at things we wrote in the past and see everything we could now do better.  We feel compelled to hang onto projects long past the time when we should have let them go.

If we keep tweaking and changing and fixing, we’ll never have a finished product to show anybody.  At some point, we have to let the baby toddle out away from our support. At some point, we have to give the manuscript over to the beta reader, the editor, the publisher. We have to accept that we cannot make it perfect — and it’s time to let it be what it is.

My new blog is a work-in-progress, and it will continue to be for a long time. I’d love for it to be nice and shiny-perfect before I show it to anyone…but if I pick at it that long, I’ll never show it to anyone. If I don’t launch my blog until it’s up to all of my nit-picky standards, then my beloved new blog will never be anything more than a dashboard and a collection of test pages.

Work on your manuscript. Change it, fix it, tweak it — but for goodness’ sake, let it go. Let it walk, and let it live. That’s the only way you’ll ever make your story truly shine.

And that’s WILAWriTWe!

P.S. If you’d like to say hi to the new blog, you may find it here: Court Can Write.  It’s about my writing life.  🙂

On Other People’s Books: Reading like a Writer

In the fall of 2010, by decree of my graduate advisor and in support of my pursuit of the Master of Professional Writing degree at the University of Oklahoma, I was required to take the “elective” course Category Fiction. I was less than thrilled.

From the course description it was clearly a lecture-based, informational class, and I was far more interested in the program’s practical classes:

  • Writing the Novel
  • Writing the Nonfiction Book, and
  • Writing the Screenplay

Worse yet, the course was scheduled mid-day on Tuesdays and Thursdays, so I knew going into it that I would have to leave work twice a week, drive forty minutes down to Norman, sit through this class for ninety minutes, and then drive back to work — where I’d have to stay late making up the lost time.

I showed up (late) to the first class period dreading the semester that was to follow. That dread lasted for all of five minutes, before I saw past the one-line catalog description to realize what the class really represented.

Over the course of the semester, we read eleven novels across six major categories. Barely half of the class consisted of lecture and all of that focused on intensely practical consideration of the real-world markets for these categories.

The rest of the class was dedicated to discussion of the individual texts, including their merits and their weaknesses. The discussion was often engaging, always enlightening, and a surprising amount of fun.

Instead of a hassle, I came to see the class as one of the highlights of my week — the world’s best book club meeting in the middle of an otherwise-dreary workday. Every meeting of the class made me a better writer, in a lot of different ways.

I want to share some of those experiences with you over the next few weeks. I’ll be starting with a review of the books we read, discussing some general principles on Thursday then talking about specific strengths and weaknesses of the individual titles on Friday.

That should last into mid-February, when I’ll probably take a break to promote Ghost Targets: Expectation, the hotly-anticipated sequel to 2010’s sci-fi thriller Gods Tomorrow.

After that, I’ve got a couple specific writing techniques I learned about for the first time last semester (and will probably be learning about in more detail this spring, as I finally get to take “Writing the Novel” under the same professor). I’ll probably give you several weeks of discussion on those techniques, too, before calling this series done.

On Collaborative Writing: Prewriting Packages

Yesterday I laid out my plan for a collaborative writing project based on some prewriting packages. Today, I’d like to talk about those packages.

The Civilization Book

This one actually started as a suggestion from Toby. It’s not a new idea, but it’s a fun idea, and it could give rise to something very cool down the line. (A website that’s sort of a ripoff of Wikipedia and sort of a ripoff of the Worst Case Scenario Survival Guides. That doesn’t really have anything to do with the novel, though.)

In a world reduced to rubble by the foul technologies of man, the scant handful of survivors live a frantic existence. Gathered in tribes for some protection, they fight a daily war against nature and their neighbors, just to stay alive.

When one brave scavenger finds a cache of survival gear from the world that was, he’s quickly robbed of everything but a worthless book in a language he’s never seen. He takes it home, miserable, but an elder who remembers the ancient tongue is able to decipher some parts of the book and in them finds a roadmap back to civilization.

The secrets of The Book quickly raise the tribe out of obscurity, but bring with them a new struggle. There are warlords with no desire to see an end to the status quo, while others in their own tribe fear a rush back to the same society that has already destroyed the world once before. Through it all, one family must cling together and decide the destiny of their civilization.

Federal Express

Oh, and remember the story about my really lonely drive home from Wichita on Christmas day? Well here’s what I spent those two and a half hours working on. I dreamed up a heist story, with a complex set of characters and a twist ending. This one should be a fun romp.

A small gang of part-time crooks gets in over its head when a FedEx truck robbery nets them hundreds of millions of dollars in stolen money. They quickly find themselves on the run, not only from local authorities but also from the ruthless crime boss who stole the money first.

They’ve got an undercover agent embedded in their team, one of them quickly starts to lose it at the stress of their situation and another threatens to move up from robber to murderer. Meanwhile, most of them are just trying to get by. There’s enough money in this one haul to set them all up forever…if they can just survive.

Johnny Cass and the Castle in Catoosa

My first attempt at a children’s book, Johnny Cass is inspired by one I read in Category Fiction last year, and also heavily by my own childhood (significantly dramatized, of course).

Johnny’s life changed the day he learned about the Castle in Catoosa. A real castle, right here in Oklahoma! He saved his allowance, he begged his mom, he even did extra chores, anxious for the day he could visit the castle.

When he got there, he was disappointed. Instead of a castle, he found a half-finished shell hidden behind sheets of cardboard painted to look like something out of a kids’ movie. Johnny knew about real castles, and this one was lame.

In his frustration, he lashed out at a knight in paper armor, and a nosy little girl saw him do it. When she tattled, he ended up stuck at the castle all summer, volunteering his time to make up for the damage done. For a while, it seemed like a cruel punishment, until he realized it gave him a chance to fix things, to make the castle everything it ought to be…and a chance to make some new friends, in the process.

Make an Offer (Creative Writing Exercise)

The lovely Kelley, writing at a coffee shopAs I said, the detailed prewriting packages for these are done. That includes a Conflict Resolution Cycle Worksheet, a detailed Character List, and a full Scene List (a brief description of what happens in every single scene from page one to the very end).

Your job would be to write the story. Carve out the block of marble for me, and I’ll make it into a statue. Or, more likely, we’ll make it into a statue together, passing rewrites back and forth until we’re both satisfied.

The finished product would be a polished manuscript attributed to both of us, with all proceeds split fairly between us. Johnny Cass and the Castle in Catoosa, by Aaron Pogue and Heather Sutherlin (just to pull an example out of the air).

Think about it. Consider whether this is something you’d like to try. I do have a few more than three readers (although, not a ton more), but as I said, I don’t think this idea would be for everyone. If I do get more interest than I have projects here…well, it’s not a problem. You might have to wait a few weeks for me to finish up another prewriting package, but I’ve got lots of stories waiting in the wings.

Hey, we might even get Courtney to throw in an idea or two.

I’d want to see a writing sample before agreeing to do this, but as I said, I know I don’t have a ton of readers and most of you have shown me writing samples. I’d be thrilled to work with any of you who’ve had me mark up your novels (for example).

One last comment, though: I’m looking for this to be a fun, friendly activity more than I’m looking for some cut-throat business partnership. If it strikes you the right way, speak up and maybe we’ll have a grand adventure. If there’s no interest at all…well, that just leaves me where I started, and I’ll finally write my first children’s book once I’m in my eighties. I can live with that.