Skip to content

What I Learned About Writing This Week…from Zombies

Once upon a time, I was a genre snob.

As far back as I can remember, I’ve been a reader of a large number of genres. When I was a kid, it was fairy tales, values stories (Joy Wilt Berry), children’s encyclopedias, young adult (Cynthia Voigt, Lois Lowry), and abridged classics with pictures. In my early teen years, fairy tale reads naturally led to YA fantasy; via my dad, I discovered Alan Dean Foster’s sci-fi “Pip and Flinx” books; and the sci-fi and fantasy interests combined in Anne McCaffrey’s “Pern” stories.

Mid-teens, I discovered the YA “Point Horror” novels (R. L. Stine, Richie Tankersley Cusick, Caroline B. Cooney, and Christopher Pike, among others). Into this mix, I added legal thrillers, mysteries, and a (blessedly brief) flirtation with teen historical romances (“Sunfire,” if you must know). Thanks to my mother, I also fell in love with Shakespeare.

Around the same time, I discovered adult thrillers and horror by the likes of John Saul, Michael Crichton, and Robin Cook. Then came Stephen King, Dean Koontz, and Anne Rice. Not long after that, my university freshman year engendered an interest in oddities such as Ancient Egyptian love poetry. If I wasn’t already a literary omnivore, my college career sealed the deal.

I even allowed the occasional mouthful of non-fiction.

The only genre — or sub-genre — I never developed a taste for was zombies.

No pun intended.

The Good, the Bad, and the Undead

Fairies, aliens, goblins, elves, viruses, mutants, vampires, crazed supercomputers — all of those, I could handle. I’ve never been squeamish (except when it comes to eyeballs), so anything a non-literary genre could throw at me, I could catch with ease.

Goblins were never anyone’s main concern. (There were always far worse villains to deal with. Necromancers and such, y’know.) Mutants had cool superpowers. Vampires might be undead, but at least they had the potential to be attractive and “clean” (if you believe Ms. Rice and, nowadays, Ms. Meyer).
In my world, zombies are slow.
But zombies? Hmm. Rotting, animated, cannibalistic corpses? Hmm. One of those abridged classics I read as a kid was Ben Hur; and though the book’s illustrations of lepers weren’t at all graphic, my brain has never had trouble painting those black-and-white pictures in vivid color and overlaying them to any imagined image of zombies.

Locomotive decomposition. Yum. Not attractive in the least. Definitely not “clean” — by any standard.

Plus, zombies just kind of shuffle, right? They can’t move fast, it’s easy to outrun them, so how in the world is that supposed to be scary? Scoffing, I went back to my psychopathic clowns, flying lizards, and warrior elves.

The Truth Will Out

Then my friend Bryan started giving me zombie literature and saying, “Here, read this. It’s good.”

I’m an omnivore. Even if I don’t think it’ll taste good, I’ll try anything once, if someone holds it right under my nose.

And that’s the story of how I finally acknowledged my literary snobbery.

Beyond the Zombie Feast

I’ve learned a lot over the past year of my introduction to zombie lore. One of the things I’ve learned is that I was partially right about zombies: In open spaces, they’re not scary — because the normal human has plenty of room to get away. The danger lies in letting a zombie corner you someplace where you can’t maneuver.

This, of course, holds true only if you belong to the Zombies Only Shuffle school of thought. Some people believe that Zombies Move Fast, but for the sake of argument, I’m just going to assume that these people are wrong.

Anyway. No matter the speed at which the zombies move, the main lesson I have learned from my Z-indoctrination is this:

Zombie stories aren’t about the zombies and how scary they are.

Zombie stories are about the people who survive — and how those survivors deal with the collapse of their world.

Zombie literature, strangely enough, is all about psychology. It’s about people and how they think and feel. It’s about how their past either helps them live through disaster — or dooms them to insanity, death, or undeath.

Will the survivors eke out a miserable existence in fear and deprivation? Or will they find the strength to rebuild, restore, and re-create? Can they band together in fellowship and reassemble the fragments of society? Or will they degenerate along with their civilization, becoming something even more monstrous than the zombies themselves?

After all, it’s not the zombies’ fault they’re barbaric. They can’t help their selfish focus on feeding their own hunger. How much worse, when a human chooses the descent into savagery, living only for the fulfillment of personal need?

Kind of makes one wonder how many “zombies” we already have walking around today, disguised as “normal” human beings.

Backdrop…Or Foreground?

To boil (ha ha) it all down to one basic statement: Zombie stories aren’t about scary grossness — they’re about characters. The survivors and how they overcome or succumb to hardship: that is what zombie stories are about. And that, gentle readers, is what each of our stories should be about, no matter what our chosen genre.

Maybe you pepper your story with explosions, manic car chases, and high-noon-style showdowns. Maybe aliens land in your main character’s backyard. Maybe she opens her door one fine spring morning to see her long-lost highschool sweetheart on the porch. The necromancer is chasing your boy wizard across an open plain, and the only spell the kid remembers is one that turns rocks into butter. Your med student walks into a hospital room where Patient Zero has crashed and bled out.

It’s all terribly exciting, breath-taking, heart-stopping, adrenaline-rushing, gross, amazing, terrifying — and it means absolutely zilch-zip-nada if you don’t know who your characters are. You can confront them with as large an undead horde as you wish, but if you don’t tell the story of what motivates your characters, nobody is going to care.

Paint a wild and fantastical a background…but remember that your characters are the ones up front and in the reader’s face. Develop those characters, illustrate their details, and you’ll have your reader’s attention from start to finish, through legal dramas and zombie hordes.

And that’s WILAWriTWe!

P.S. My latest zombie read is World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War by Max Brooks.

On Reading Like a Writer: How to Write within Your Genre

This week we’re talking about becoming a better writer through your reading, and yesterday I talked about a college class I’m taking on that very topic. So far we’ve read How to Train Your Dragon, Jeremy Fink and the Meaning of Life, The Cinderella Deal, and First Lady.

I don’t really read much young adult fiction, but How to Train Your Dragon was a lot of fun, and Jeremy Fink was surprisingly heartfelt. As far as those last two, genre romance…well, if you’ll recall, yesterday I talked about learning from books whether you like them or not. Let’s just say I learned a lot from the romance novels.

How Genres Work

Just two genres in, and neither of them my genres, I’m learning a lot about genre writing. One of the big benefits of that study has been learning why we have genres, and how they work.

Genres as we think of them were invented by bookstore owners. Booksellers wanted to know where to shelve new books, where to send customers looking for new material. They eventually flexed their financial muscle and made publishers cooperate, labeling books (and, ultimately, selecting books to publish) based on a handful of arbitrary category designations.

Over the last hundred years, those categories have become so entrenched that publishers now deal exclusively in certain categories, editors and agents specialize in just a handful, and writers — by and large — restrict themselves to working in just one or two.

Readers use the categories, too. They learn which ones they like, which genres run the right length for them, which ones have the right kind of endings, which ones offer the right balance between character and plot.

Those are all book-specific elements, and they’re all very subjective. There’s no right way or wrong way to do any of them, but the industry has settled on standards within each category, and a reader can expect most thrillers to run 90,000-110,000 words, and most fantasy novels to focus on adventure over character development.

Finding Your Genre

Those standards are all arbitrarily limiting, but readers have learned to make the most of it. And, unless you want to spend your career wrestling with editors, publishers, and your readers’ expectations, you should probably do the same.

Chances are good you’ve already got a genre. I had one, when I started. Without ever so much as considering it I dove right into high fantasy, and it startles me when I look back now at Taming Fire and even The Poet Alexander — despite the technical weaknesses in my early writing, I mostly got the genre conventions perfect. Courtney did the same with her high fantasy Triad.

But for the last few years I haven’t been writing high fantasy. As soon as I started on Gods Tomorrow, I was in unfamiliar territory. It’s sort of science fiction, sort of mystery/suspense, sort of thriller…it’s even got elements of romance. And I barely know any of those genres at all!

Writing Your Own Story

That didn’t stop me writing the story, and I’ve been told it’s the best story I’ve ever written. The problem is that, as I’ve spent the last month trying to get the book published, I’ve found myself slamming against those arbitrary walls again and again. I’ve done a lot of work trying to perfect my promotional material to manage reader expectations, but if I’d written my story according to the genre rules I wouldn’t have to mess with any of that.

And even as I’m finishing up that project, I’m starting from scratch on some urban fantasy and classic science fiction, in addition to the ongoing cop drama series. And, for her part, Courtney’s writing Christian urban fantasy and she’s tried her hand at humorous metafiction. Chances are good, no matter where you start, that you’ll eventually want to strike out and try something new.

It’s fun. It’s an adventure! I strongly encourage you to do that sort of experimenting (and NaNoWriMo is a great time to do it), but as your writing coach, I also encourage you to save yourself some trouble.

Any time you delve into a new genre, do yourself a favor and spend some time reading like a writer. Explore the category, compare and contrast, and figure out what’s consistent within the genre. What’s the standard length? What’s the plot pacing? Are the endings light or dark? How much time do the characters spend thinking? Talking? Traveling? Fighting?

You’ll save yourself grief if you can stick within those guidelines, but you might also be surprised to learn it’s not all limitations. Once you learn the rules, you can put them to work for you — just like readers do. It can simplify the writing process every bit as much as it does the sales process.

Try it out and let me know what you find. And for my part, I’ll tell you how things work out with Gods Tomorrow. We’re always learning, every step of the way.

On Reading Like a Writer: Every Page Counts

I’ve got to make an admission before I get too far into this topic, because there are just too many of you who know me in real life.

I don’t really read a lot.

Well…not a lot of books, anyway. I’m sure I spend 80% of my waking hours reading, but it’s far more likely to be emails, memos, training materials, technical instruction manuals, news articles, or blog posts, than it is to be any kind of fiction. And the fiction I do find the time to read is almost always a friend’s unpublished draft.

That’s a fairly recent phenomenon, though, and it has changed a little bit in the last month. As you probably know, I started working on a Master of Professional Writing at OU this fall, and one of my first two classes has been Category Fiction. We’re spending the whole semester looking closely at several of the most popular commercial genres out there, and for homework I’ll end up reading 13 novels over the course of 14 weeks.

That’s more published fiction in one semester than I’ve read in the last four years combined. And the whole focus of the class is reading like a writer: you should be learning what works, what doesn’t work, and why, in everything you read.

Finding Things You Hate

The way you do that is by looking closely at what an author is doing in the story. When you’re reading, instead of focusing exclusively on how the story affects you, spend a little time considering how the writer creates those effects.

Nathan Bransford had a fantastic article on just that topic a while back. (I shared that link in my newsletter a couple months ago, but I don’t know that I ever talked about it here.) He said:

The one question that aspiring writers should never ask themselves when reading a book is, “Do I like this?”

Here’s the thing about the question “Do I like this?” Who is that question about? Well, it’s about you. It’s about your taste, and whether the book fits in with your likes and dislikes. It’s not about the book. It’s about you and whether the book spoke to you.

That doesn’t mean you have to love the book. In class yesterday, we spent seventy-five minutes discussing a pulp Romance novel that I wouldn’t recommend to anyone, ever, and I spent a large portion of the class talking about the things in the book I hated.

I didn’t allow myself more than a moment or two to discuss the way I felt about it, though. Instead I focused on the things the author had done wrong that made me feel that way — faltering narrative tension, erratic fluctuations in character motivation, and a big dramatic climax (for the characters) that was little more than a formality for readers.

Finding Things You Like

You’re robbing yourself of valuable material if you just focus on the things you hate, though. One of the points Bransford makes in that post, and one my professor echoed on the very first day of class, is that these published books passed muster. Say what you will about traditional publishing, but it’s an extremely selective process and my professor went out of her way to pick novels that have proven commercially successful.

That means they work — not necessarily as works of fine art, but as stories aimed at wide audiences, these books are working. And that goes for Dan Brown and Stephenie Meyer and any other writer whose name you know. I haven’t hesitated to throw punches at times when it comes to things they do wrong, but I’m not blind to the fact that these authors are clearly doing something right.

And, more importantly, they’re doing it right enough to make up for their wrongs. If you can approach successful novels with enough of a discerning eye to recognize both, you can walk away with the knowledge needed to borrow their successes and avoid their failures.

How to Write within Your Genre

As a matter of fact…you’ve been doing that all your life. My dad has been studying writing since he first started reading The Hardy Boys, decades before he ever thought he might want to try a novel someday.

When you approach it deliberately, though, you can dramatically increase the amount of detail you’ll pick up. In fact, if you want to get the very most out of your reading, you should not only manage your reading style, but manage your selection as well.

Come back tomorrow, and I’ll talk a little bit about perfecting your genre writing.

On Reading Like a Writer: Better than Expected

It’s time for another post about my dad. Before we dive in, let’s have a brief review:

  • He’s an accomplished debater, and wins every fight with sheer Dadness
  • He’s always been a natural storyteller
  • He spent a long time wanting to write a book, and I spent a long time telling him he should

Today’s post isn’t about debate at all, but his novel was, and the fact that he ever wrote a novel emerged directly from the second and third points. I understand why he was hesitant — writing a book is a huge endeavor — but he’s a born storyteller so how could he fail to write a great book?

That was my thinking when I bullied him into doing NaNoWriMo. He succeeded, as I already said, and when he finished the month with a fresh-written rough draft, he did the natural and obvious thing: he gave it to me to review.

And, of course, I immediately started worrying. How could I possibly criticize his book after I was the one who’d made him write it? Before I ever glanced at the first page, I started giving him my disclaimers — every first draft needs work, every first novel has some weaknesses, and my style isn’t his style.

I belabored the points, trying to make it clear that he should expect lots of critique from me, but it certainly wasn’t a criticism of his writing ability. He assured me (time and again), that he’s a grown man, and he could take it.

So, finally, I started reading it…and I was amazed. There were problems — some of the same unforgivable sins I was talking about last month — but the story overwhelmed me. The characters were rich, their problems engaging, and the plot moved exactly where it needed to. In short…it was a fantastic first novel.

I wasn’t so greedy as to keep that information to myself, of course. I put praise in my feedback right along with notes of typos and the sort of writing advice that would ultimately grow into blog posts here at Unstressed Syllables. And I tried to be just as detailed in my praise as I was in my criticism, telling him why his good characterization was good, and how the effective scenes achieved their effects.

A lot of the value in that came from some basic audience analysis. I read his book as an interested reader, but whenever I stopped to give feedback, I spent some time considering things from my dad’s point of view as a writer. If he had a misstep inspired by too much time watching movies, I could figure that out and use it to clarify not only what he was doing, but also why.

When it came to the praise, though, I found myself going back to the same source again and again. Virtually everything he did right, he did because he reads. Voraciously.

Every Page Counts

Dad’s a great storyteller. I’d never deny it. But his magic with spoken story comes from subtle use of voice and pacing and an understanding of nonverbal communication theory — stuff that’s completely lost on the page (or achieved in a very different manner). No, most of his skill as a writer comes from the sheer number of pages he’s read in his lifetime (and he’s read a lot).

If you’re a writer, you should be reading too. You probably already are, so I won’t bother trying too hard to sell the recommendation, but I can tell you some of the best things I’ve gotten out of my reading, and how to read as a writer (instead of just reading as a reader). Come back tomorrow, and I’ll dive right in.

Photo Courtesy Shannon Iverson.

What I Learned About Writing This Week…from Georges Polti

Prologue

“Pinky, are you pondering what I’m pondering?”

“Well, I think so, Brain — but if Jimmy cracks corn, and no one cares, why does he keep doing it?”

Sorry, inklings. I know I had you going pretty good there for a second. But, sadly, today’s article has absolutely nothing to do with Pinky and The Brain. That quote popped into my head as I sat down to write what was to be my first sentence, beginning with, “As I sat here, pondering…”

“Pondering” naturally led to genetically engineered, cartoon white mice with dreams of world domination. Don’t ask me why my brain works that way. It just does. And since Aaron lets me get away with writing anything here (as long as I don’t reveal the details of his dreams of world domination), you get to share in the joyous meanderings of my peculiar mind. Ain’t that speshul?

*ahem*

So. Anyway. As I sat here, pondering the myriad of possible WILAWriTWe topics, through my peculiar mind flashed not only the image of cranially enhanced rodents, but also the memory of a book I keep tucked away on my shelf of writing-related tomes.

Main Body

The book in question, gentle readers, is The Thirty-Six Dramatic Situations by Georges Polti*. Way back when I was a little whippersnapper convinced she would publish her first novel by age 15 (to beat out S. E. Hinton, you understand), my mother bought me a slew of writing how-tos, most of which I’ve looked at for years but haven’t read cover-to-cover. Mr. Polti’s, for instance, was originally published in 1921 — and if I’m gonna read non-fiction, I’d like it to be a bit further removed from the thees and thous of the King James era. (Not that Polti approaches such language, but still, his tone and style are cumbersome for an educated 33-year-old of 2010 to digest. For a teenager in 1992, “palatable” never even entered into it.)

What’s more, Polti’s alphabetized index comprises a full third of the book, which is way more intellectual information than I want to process when I’m in creative mode.

But. Polti’s book does serve as interesting reference material, especially because of his basic premise: that there’s no such thing as an original plot. Humankind exhausted its store of fresh, new situations long ago; “there is nothing new under the sun” (The Bible, Ecclesiastes 1:9). On the title page, he quotes:

Gozzi maintained that there can be but thirty-six tragic situations. Schiller took great pains to find more, but he was unable to find even so many as Gozzi.

–Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

What Gozzi, Schiller, and Goethe claim, Polti makes his own and runs with. He spends 5.3 pages defending his thesis, then goes on to present the 36 definitive situations and their variations. Some of these include (in random order):

Slaying of a kinsman unrecognized
The Enigma
Crimes of love
Obtaining
Daring enterprise
Deliverance
Loss of loved one
Erroneous judgment
All sacrificed for a passion
Fatal imprudence
Madness
Revolt
Rivalry of kinsmen
Abduction

etc.

Polti presents each situation with its elements and its variations, as well as examples. For instance, for the situation he labels “Obtaining,” he presents the following elements:

A Solicitor and an Adversary Who is Refusing, or an Arbitrator and Opposing Parties

and variations, with selected examples:

A — Efforts to Obtain an Object by Ruse or Force: — the “Philoctetes” of Aeschylus, of Sophocles and of Euripedes; “The Minister’s Ring” by Vishakadatta
B — Endeavor by Means of Persuasive Eloquence Alone: — “The Desert Isle” by Metastasio; Scene 2 of Act V of Shakespeare’s “Coriolanus”
C — Eloquence With an Arbitrator: — “The Judgment of Arms” by Aeschylus; “Helen Reclaimed” by Sophocles.

And, lest my article degenerate into the dry academia of pseudo-intellectualization, allow me to remark that Polti has a greater affinity for the hyphen than do I, which is quite the feat, lemme tell ya.

Oy vey!

Conclusion

I haven’t the faintest clue if Polti’s thesis stands up to modern literary research — and I ain’t gonna investigate further, neither. 😉 I remember, once-upon-a-time, thinking that 36 seemed awfully limiting…but now, after experiencing writer’s block and the joy of its lifting, I believe 36 is about as liberating as it gets. And with that kind of freedom staring me in the face, I don’t need to look further for something I can use.

Think about it. You’re stuck. Your main character’s stuck. You’ve written both of you into a tight squeeze you can’t extricate yourselves from. You know the hopeless, helpless, enraging, demoralizing frustration of which I speak. You sit down to write, and nothing happens — because you have absolutely no clue where to go next with this thing that’s supposed to morph into a story, and an attention-grabbing one at that.

You’re in this hideous, dark cave with no way out…

…except, in truth, you have at least 35 escape routes.

One of 36 routes, you used to get in — but you have 35 different ways of getting out. These are 35 tunnel entrances, and you have the leisure and the luxury of choosing your favorite one, for every single one is a happy-ending exit. Not only that, but each of them branches out into multiple side tunnels — let’s call ’em “variations,” what say? — each of which also leads to the blessed freedom of rediscovering the entertaining pace of your story.

So, writer, find yourself a Polti. Either a copy of his book, or some other resource that lists plot types. If nothing else, peruse that truncated list of options I gave you up there and confront your main character with one of them. How s/he deals with the obstacle is what will extricate both of you and get you where you need to be.

And that’s WILAWriTWe!

Epilogue

* No offense to the long-deceased Mr. Polti…but that makes me think George’s poultry. Weirdly-functioning brain again.

Photo credit Julie V. Photography.

On Document Style: How to Use Section Breaks in Microsoft Word

Here we go again, diving back into Microsoft Word and the murky world of section breaks with the next-to-last week in our month-long look at professional document formatting. This week we’ve been talking about page setup, and — like headers and footers and text columns before — page setup is a per-section setting.

Changing Orientation

By this point, I really do think you know how to use section breaks in Microsoft Word, though. So instead of spending a lot of time on that, I’m going to tell you where and how to adjust your page setup elements. Just remember that, for each one, when you make changes you can either make changes for the whole document, or just within the current section.

Modifying page orientation is a really straightforward example. If you want a document that consists mostly of Portrait Letter pages filled with text, but occasionally switches to Landscape Letter pages filled with landscape-oriented photographs, you would need to insert a section break before and after each of the pages you wanted in Landscape, then click somewhere inside the page and change the setting for that section only.

To do that, navigate to the Page Setup controls. In older versions of Word, you do that from the main menu by selecting File | Page Setup, which opens a new dialogue box. In newer versions, you can simply click on the Page Setup tab at the top of the screen to open a ribbon which contains all the same controls.

Make sure the Apply To dropdown box say “This section,” make sure your cursor is inside the page you want rotated, and then just click the Landscape orientation button. Just like that, you’ve applied a section-specific setting to manage page layout.

Maintaining Usable Margins

Then, of course, there’s margins. I spent a lot of time yesterday waxing romantic about page margins, but what do you expect? Spend as much time thinking about page margins as I do, and you’ll either end up loving them or hating them. Same goes for typos (hate), em dashes (love), paragraph styles that automatically jump to the top of a page (love), and publishing guidelines that require every chapter to start on an odd-numbered page (hate).

Oh, the glamorous life of a Tech Writer.

I think the only guideline I gave yesterday was that your margins should be “generous.” That’s not very specific, but it’s hard to give a fixed value across the board. A 1″ margin creates a much different effect on a sheet of Statement-sized paper than it does on 11″ x 17″.

It’s a handy reference point, though. 1″ margins all the way around are pretty standard on Letter-sized paper. If you switch to Legal (which is a lot taller), you might add a quarter inch to top and bottom. If your page is smaller, make it a little smaller. If it’s larger, make it a little larger.

In the same way, if you have a header make sure you’ve got enough room on the top margin to support it (you usually want at least a 1″ margin, so there’s at least half an inch of whitespace outside the half-inch header area). And if you’ve got a footer make sure you’ve got enough room for it in the bottom margin.

I also talked yesterday about “mirrored margins” — handling right and left margins differently on right-hand and left-hand pages. That’s a far more important thing to get right. Luckily, Word makes it pretty easy.

Once again, open the Page Setup controls, and then look for a checkbox labeled Different odd and even. (On the dialogue box, you’ll find it on the Layout tab.) Once you check that box, the margin fields will switch from saying “Left” and “Right” to “Inside” and “Outside.”

You’ll also see the “Gutter” field, which lets you add extra margin in that inside edge of the page trapped against the binding. A regular 1″ outside margin is usually enough if you’re planning to do a top-corner staple or hole-punch for a 3-ring binder, but if the edges of your pages are going to be bound together, I’ve often heard it recommended to add 1/8″ per 50 pages.

Making Your Document Smarter

Today’s article isn’t a terribly complicated one, but you can give credit for that to Microsoft. Page Setup is a crucial part of professional document formatting, and they made it pretty easy.

Next week I plan to finish up this series with a look at a little bit more complicated tool, but also one of the coolest (and handiest) features for polishing the professional appearance of your document. We’ll talk about adding smart text to your headers and footers, and keeping track of your references.

Definitely come back for that one. You’ll be glad you did.

On Document Style: Page Layout

I started yesterday with a story about getting the most out of every page of my scribblebook. These day I actually do something pretty similar at work, twisting and reflowing thousand-page instruction books in an effort to shave printing costs while maintaining as much usability as possible.

Your tax dollars at work.

Paper Size

One of the first choices in a document’s page layout is the paper it’s going to be printed on. If you’re going to have to deal with printing and binding a document (and the associated costs), paper size becomes a critical concern. Standard sizes will usually print cheaper (although not always), but you’ll have to think through what size of pages will most effectively contain the information you need to present.

If you’re really involved (or really trying to manage costs), you’ll also have to think about what size sheets the pages will be printed on. In large print runs, there’s often four or more document pages per sheet of printer paper. These large sheets are then cut or folded to create document pages, and every additional cut or fold adds to your document’s manufacturing cost.

In all likelihood you won’t have to deal with any of that, but even if you’re just working on the $60 inkjet in your home office, you still have choices to make. Do you want to print your document on a standard sheet of Letter paper (8 1/2″ x 11″), or a taller Legal page (8 1/2″ x 14″). Most office printers will also come stocked with 11″ x 17″ sheets, which can be quite handy for foldout illustrations.

Another standard print size, common for trade paperbacks, is 5 1/2″ x 8 1/2″, which you can get by folding a sheet of Letter in half or cutting along its center line. You can sometimes get a professional look for a short booklet by setting up your book as two columns of text on a landscape sheet of Letter, then folding it and stapling it along the middle.

Paper Orientation

Landscape pages are pages wider than they are tall. It’s a popular layout for printing posters and heavily-illustrated documents like children’s picture books. Landscape isn’t as effective for text-heavy pages, though. Generally, you should manage your text columns so readers don’t have to turn their heads at all while reading a row from left to right.

In our documents at work we’ll often use landscape 11″ x 17″ pages for engineering schematics, tucked between 8 1/2″ x 11″ portrait pages of body text. It takes a little bit of work to manage those transitions in Word but it creates a much more readable document than we’d get spilling all those text pages over sprawling 17″-wide pages or trying to cram detailed drawings into an 8 1/2″ space.

And of course we don’t get to use all 8 1/2″. In fact, we use the same 1″ margins you remember from school papers, so we’re left with a text column that’s only 6.5″ from left to right.

The Purpose of Margins

Have you ever stopped to think about page margins? As a technical writer, I certainly have. Margins steal significant amounts of print area from every page in your document, but they serve an important purpose. In fact, depending on your perspective, they serve several.

They’re popular places to scribble comments and notes, but margins exist for much more practical reasons: to protect the information contained in a document.

The page edges are the weak link in the book as a storage format for information. If a closed book gets wet, the water damage is worst along the outside edges. As a book gets old and tattered, it’s the edges of the page that crack and fall apart. Keeping wide margins allows us to respect the physical limitations of our media and still protect the information we’re trying to convey to readers.

And readers certainly benefit from margins, even if the document they’re reading isn’t a water-stained antique. Generous outside margins give readers a place to hold the document without blocking text with their hands. A wide top and inside margin lets a reader staple a loose-leaf document without losing the ability to read the top inside corner of every page.

I said “inside” and “outside” there instead of “left” and “right,” because they change when you’re printing pages front-and-back. If you think of a thick paperback book, there’s a lot of page next to the spine that can be tough to read. On a left-hand page that’s the right margin, and on a right-hand page it’s the left margin, but in either case it’s the inner margin. We call that unreadable edge next to the spine the “gutter.”

How to Use Section Breaks in Microsoft Word

That’s a lot of stuff to manage, but if you’re trying to produce a professionally-formatted document, you need to consider every aspect of your reader’s experience. The good news is, modern word processors provide tools to handle all of it, and to handle it well.

I’ll show you where to find the necessary options tomorrow, when we look yet again at how to use section breaks in Microsoft Word.

On Document Style: My First Scribblebook

Black and white of Aaron Pogue's scribblebook, showing a scene from Gods Tomorrow.I’ve waxed romantic around here before about scribblebooks, but that’s always been late in the week when I was talking to my creative writers. Scribblebooks are great for the Art School types, but they don’t have a lot of appeal for serious business writers.

And actually…I complain sometimes about my day job, but I’ve always been a pretty technical sort, even when I’m caught up in my creative side. Technical Writing holds a real appeal to me whether or not I need it to pay the bills, and for precisely that reason it took me a little while to settle into using scribblebooks.

My first scribblebook was a gift to me in high school, and it came with the sincere dedication:

Aaron,

This book is for you to sketch down your thoughts and poems.

Love, Lindsay

It seemed far too small for the grand, world-changing ideas I was busy with in my writing, but I used it to capture notes to myself. The pagers were unlined, too, so it made a handy sketchbook, and I’d scratch out rough sketches of scenes from my book from time to time (usually while I was bored in some science or history class).

A couple years later I got to college and needed to take a lot more notes to keep up with everything I was doing. I dug out my old, almost-forgotten scribblebook and put it to use for class notes (and, once again, doodling when I was bored in Gen Eds).

That’s when I really started seeing the potential of it, too. I carried it with me everywhere, and it became my address book, my datebook, and it finally started to serve its initial purpose as I started capturing snippets of prose I wanted to put in a book someday.

On my mission trip, it became a security blanket, and I’d dive into its pages when I needed to escape all the people. I wrote poems about the cold loneliness of religion that made it into my college literary magazine, and notes to myself trying to capture the memories of these fascinating people I met for a moment, and wanted to remember for a lifetime. The last page has a tally of all the things I’d bought while in Britain, scribbled during the last half hour of my flight home so I could report it all to customs.

I got back from that trip absolutely dependent on my scribblebook, and devastated that it was full. Trish got me a new one right away, and after I filled that one, too, I ended up going back through both of them and filling up every half-inch of whitespace I could find with a rough outline for a non-fiction book on grilling that I never got around to writing.

Page Layout

I wouldn’t expect everyone to see the beauty I find in a well-abused scribblebook, but there’s a certain magic to the humble piece of paper. It’s amazing how many different purposes it can serve, how many forms of communication it offers — formal and informal, private and public.

This week I want to talk to you about pages — paper size, page orientation, and margins. It might seem like a trivially basic concern, but getting the foundation right will make the whole rest of your structure stronger. So come back tomorrow for a look at the various aspects of page layout in a professionally-formatted document.

On Needing to Write: How to Write When You Really Don’t Want To

This week I’ve been talking about my experience with National Novel Writing Month in 2007. Thursday featured a big bragging story about my 120,000-word month, and yesterday I gave some useful advice about how to handle too much of a good thing.

Nobody’s really coming here looking for advice about that, though, are they? Too much of a good thing is usually still a pretty nice problem to have. As writers, we spend a lot more time worrying about the words that just aren’t there.

And well we should. A writer, by definition, is someone who writes. I spent most of four years not writing, and a lot of that time wondering what that made me. The only answer to the question that ever made me happy was the one that came when I started writing again.

Writer’s Block

What I’m talking about here is what writers mean when they talk about writer’s block. People who aren’t writers sometimes use the phrase, and often imagine complicated, mystical things associated with the mysterious writing practice, but that rarely overlaps much with the real experience.

In reality, writer’s block is a terribly mundane and boring thing. It’s the fundamental desire, when it comes time to work on a story, to do something else. Sometimes that means typing out useless first sentences and building a mountain of crumpled papers around the trash can, but far more often it takes the form of an active social life (or participation in a social network). For me, writer’s block has often meant getting caught up on my newsfeeds and webcomics…or maybe getting a new alt to 80.

It’s insidious, though — a minute wasted here, a half hour squandered there, and a lot of totally reasonable choices to do something useful instead of staring at a blank page for an hour…and the next thing you know, it’s been four years since you last did any meaningful work.

I make a big deal out of my drought from 2003 to 2007, and that’s exactly how it happened. Then I finished 2007 with a quarter-million words written in one year, and four finished books to my name (quite an improvement over one at the end of 2006). I grinned real big, and imagined how much I could get done in 2008.

Turned out, the answer was a lot smaller than I’d anticipated. I got one book written the next year — my NaNo novel. I blame burnout for that one. I did too much in ’07 and had to take a break. But whether it’s because of too much success or too little, eleven months without writing is eleven months wasted.

Pushing Through

Maybe that’s a little bleak, but it only scratches the surface of the invective and guilt you’ll probably find for yourself when you’re really caught up in it. I don’t say any of this by way of accusation, but as a warning.

And with the warning comes a bit of advice. It’s nothing new. You’ve heard it here, and you’ve heard it everywhere writing is discussed: write every day.

But here’s the application: sometimes you really are blocked. Sometimes you really can’t find anywhere to go with the project you need to be working on. And when that day comes, if you can’t find a way to move on, you’re done. Your entire existence as a writer hangs at the mercy of fickle inspiration.

Most of the time, it’s not like that. Most of the time, writer’s block is a temporary distraction. Most of the time, if you wake up on Tuesday and just don’t feel like writing today, there’s absolutely no consequence at all for not writing.

And those are the days when you absolutely must. Those days are practice for the ones that really matter. If you can find the determination and the self-control to write when the sun is shining and you’d rather go play in the grass, you’ll have that to draw on when the thunderstorms of self-doubt have you wondering if you’re really a writer at all.

1,667 Words Right Now (Creative Writing Exercise)

The lovely Kelley, writing at a coffee shopUltimately, if you’re going to be successful as a writer, you’ll have to learn to write when you don’t want to. You’ll have to learn to say something even when you’ve got nothing to say. You’ll have to learn to make time when there’s just absolutely no time. That’s why they invented NaNoWriMo, and why November is as good a month for it as any.

I don’t write every day. I’ll admit that right here. This article is as much an admonishment to me as it is to any of you. That doesn’t take anything away from the message, though.

If I did write every day, I wouldn’t have the problems with writer’s block that I have. I have those problems, though.

If I did write every day, I wouldn’t be — once again — sitting on a handful of languishing manuscripts, with nothing new finished since last year’s NaNoWriMo.

I’ve spent a lot of the last year working on it, though, and I give myself a lot of credit for the work I’ve done here, and the work I’ve done for the Creative Copy Challenge. Both projects have driven me, at times I didn’t want to write at all, to just sit down and churn something out. And I’ve always, always, always been glad that I did.

So that’s your assignment this week. But, no, not this week — now. Right now. Write 1,667 words of a story. Put it in a scribblebook or a blog post, in Google Docs or a Word .doc. Wherever you’re writing, whatever you’re working, put in one day’s worth of writing, right now, even if you’ve got absolutely nothing to write.

It might be painful. It will probably tough. It will definitely be magical, though, because there’s a special kind of transformation that happens when you make yourself write.

You turn into a writer.

On Needing to Write: Feeding the Hunger

I talked yesterday about my amazingly successful first NaNoWriMo — in terms of word count, anyway. It’s hard for me to give myself too much credit for the book, though. It’s still in its first draft state, and sitting in limbo as the third book in a four-part series that’s still missing a decent introduction, and is probably never going to see the light of day.

It’s a shame, too, because I made some awesome characters and told precisely the story I wanted to tell. Still, as they say, every page counts. There’s no way Katie would be the strong, empathic woman she is today if Sarah hadn’t first been the oft-helpless, always-caring ingenue she was way back then.

All of that is beside the point, though. This week I want to talk about needing to write. That was my story for 2007, and it has propelled me in some fascinating ways directly to the place I am today. I felt the need to write, and I fed the hunger.

Capturing What You Can’t Tame

In yesterday’s story, I mentioned a desperate desire to get started right away — in October, when I first started working through the story idea — even though my main inspiration had come from a desire to do NaNoWriMo.

That’s a pretty artificial limitation, but it’s one several of us are wrestling with again right now. I know Courtney’s really chomping at the bit, and honestly I feel the same way. SEATAC is screaming at me to start putting words on paper, and I refuse.

Well…that’s not quite right. I refuse to put narrative on paper, but there are a lot of sci-fi action/adventure words getting saved to my Google Docs account. I’ve talked about my prewriting before, and I will again — most of the way I do things sprang directly from those exercises I prepared for my sister and my dad in our first NaNoWriMo.

Those exercises are a fantastic way to channel the need to write when you can’t actually write. Sometimes you can’t write because it’s not 00:00 November 1 yet, but far more often you can’t write because you’re already busy working on three other works-in-progress, or you don’t have enough details yet, or you’re juggling too many other projects to give writing a decent effort…or there’s just not enough time to scribble down a whole chapter before the light turns green.

Whatever the reason, it’s part of the writer’s experience that, from time to time, you’ll end up with a burning passion to work on a book and yet completely unable to do so. I hate to see that energy lost, though, so I’ve developed a handful of practical exercises that tap into the storytelling without actually storytelling. They’re things like mock ToCs, character bios, synopses, and that Conflict Resolution Cycle worksheet.

The purpose of prewriting exercises like that isn’t necessarily to come up with material for a story, but to pin it down. I’ve found from lots of good experience that if I channel genuine inspiration into these particular vessels, I can come back to it years later and pick up right where I left off.

Saving Some for Later

Sometimes starting on the story isn’t the problem so much as it’s making yourself stop. I’ve certainly been there. When I’m in the zone, I can generate 2,000-4,000 words an hour, and I’ve been known to do 11,000 at a sitting.

That can make short work of a 50,000 word target, but it can also make for some pretty sloppy storytelling. Doing that much on pure adrenaline can be a thrill, but (take it from me) it’s also a good way to trip over your own ingenuity.

Worse yet, it’s a surefire way to get burnt out. Taking it slow, though — pacing yourself — can pay huge rewards.

That’s one of the most valuable things I learned in the summer of 2007, as I was publishing three scenes a week to my blog while I finished up The Wolf . I figured out that if I stopped writing every night while I still had something to say, excruciating though that was (especially as I approached the climax), it made it a lot easier to pick up writing again the next morning.

I definitely recommend that method. Save some for later, pace yourself. Even when you’re in the throes of inspiration, on fire with your story, manage that energy. With a little bit of direction, you can keep it going for months instead of days.

Writing When You Don’t Want To

Eventually, though, you’re going to run out of steam. We all do. It’s just another part of the writing experience.

Feast or famine, though, it’s your job to keep doing the best you can to improve your writing. That can be hard, but the agony is just as manageable as the ecstasy. Come back tomorrow, and I’ll talk a bit about how to write when you really don’t want to.