Skip to content

What I Learned About Writing This Week…from Perfectionism

Whaddaya mean, I can't fix it?

In case I haven’t mentioned it often enough lately: I’m getting published.

And yes, indeed, there is much rejoicing.

However…there is also a stinkin’ huge amount of get-your-hands-dirty, fry-your-brain work. I haven’t had a lot of downtime lately.

Which is why this week’s WILAWriTWe is going to be short and sweet. (Let all the inklings say yeah.) 😉

The One Where I’m A Perfectionist

Oh, had I not mentioned that before? Well, it’s true. I’m a perfectionist. Yes, I get it that it’s often an unrealistic mindset. Yes, I understand it’s a control issue. Yes, I understand it’s a boundary problem within my own head.

Hallelujah, I’ve been aware of these things for a long time, and I’ve been working on decreasing the intensity of my perfectionism for a long time, and I’ve actually gotten better, sha-zam.

But there are some things about which I cannot be perfectionist. Not because I don’t want to be. But because I simply can’t. The situation is so far beyond my control, there is no possibility at all of my getting my perfectionist way about it.

One of these things is my hair. I love the pixie cut I’ve adopted over the past 8 months; it’s the first style I’ve enjoyed with complete, unadulterated passion.

But the fact remains that as much as I love the cut, the nature of my hair will forever be outside my control. My hair is baby-fine. I’d like to have about 50% more of it.

I will never, ever have the thick, luxurious mane of auburn hair that I would so very dearly love to have. I got baby-fine-hair gene from both of my parents. Genetically, I was doomed before birth never to be a hair model.

This is beyond my control. My hair will never live up to my standards. I cannot be perfectionist about it.

I can’t be perfectionist about the format of my book for Kindle, either.

This Is the Part Where It Gets Short & Sweet

I promise.

Last night, I started proofing the Kindle version of Colors of Deception. Aaron warned me that I would find formatting errors that, because of the nature of Kindle, we will be unable to correct. When he informed me of this, I nodded sagely and assured him I could handle the reality of the situation.

I can handle it.

I can handle it.

I swear I can.

See? This is me. Handling it. I’m fine. Really.

*sigh*

Yeah, those formatting errors are there. And because of the coding or whatever behind the Kindle text, there’s nothing we can do about it.

In the hopes that maybe you won’t notice them, dear inklings, I’m not going to delineate for you what those errors are. Not because I doubt your error-spotting prowess, but because I’m hoping you’ll be less perfectionist about all this than I am. After all, this is my kid, not yours. You’re not gonna check behind its ears. All you wanna do is read it (I hope).

In Which I Get All Conclusion-Drawing-y and Stuff

The thing is, this was always going to happen. I was always going to publish a less-than-perfect book, dear readers — because there is no such thing as a perfect book.

This afternoon, I start proofing the .pdf that will eventually become the printed paperback. When those paperbacks are printed, they will contain errors. So far, seven other people besides me have proofed this book. I myself have read it uncountable times. And guess what? Last week, I found a typo that none of us had previously caught.

Was that the last typo? The only error left in the entire manuscript?

You bet yer patootie it wasn’t.

There will always be something left to fix. That’s the nature of books. Even if we did manage to eliminate all the spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors, I could still find something to fix with every new read-through.

I could easily spend the rest of my life tinkering around on this single manuscript. I would do it, if I let my perfectionism get the best of me.

But if I did, I would never publish the book. Or any book. In which case the entire exercise becomes moot. Why tinker around on a book that nobody will ever read?

So I’m letting go. I’m putting out my book for the world to see, and I’m doing it in full knowledge that the book contains mistakes. Sure, I’m going to do my absolute best to eliminate as many errors as possible before Launch Day — but launch I shall, and in understanding that the book isn’t perfect.

And guess what?

It’s perfectly okay.

And that’s WILAWriTWe.

On Writing Technique: Annabelle’s Magic

Last week Trish went to book club which meant that, for just one evening, I had to watch the kids all by myself. It was terrifying.

Now don’t get me wrong, I love my kids. They’re astonishingly smart and absolutely adorable, and I have a lot of fun playing with them when I get home from work. But watching them? Taking care of them? Keeping them safe and happy for hours at a time? That’s not my strong suit.

I have a trick, though. Whenever I’m responsible for them for an evening, I drag out that same old trick, and it works every time. So we waved goodbye to Trish, watched her pull out of the driveway and head off down the road, and as soon as she was out of sight we piled into the car and headed to McDonalds.

Getting ’em both fed was still a chaotic challenge, but it ended with a mess that someone else would have to clean up, and I turned the kids loose in the play area to burn the better part of another hour.

The nice thing about that setup is that I wasn’t spending any time worrying about what would come later — whether that was washing dishes or putting away leftovers or figuring out how to entertain the kids. Instead, I spent the whole evening either talking with them, or watching them play. That was fun.

On the drive home, we were doing some more of that talking when Annabelle told me her finger was hurting. She started to cry, “Ow ow ow! It hurts!” and I started trying to figure out what could have happened to her finger while playing at McDonalds.

The promise of a bandaid calmed her down enough to talk, and she told me it had happened earlier. At home. We got home and I applied some Neosporin and a bandaid, and then she danced right off to her bedroom to play.

The next day, I got home from work and Trish said, “Did you see Annabelle hurt her finger?” I nodded, told her the story of it, and she shook her head. “Did you look at it?” she asked. I stared blankly, and she said, “It’s a splinter.”

My heart dropped. Annabelle’s got an awful lot of charms, but sitting patiently through a little home surgery on the pad of her finger wasn’t going to be one of them. We brought her into the kitchen, and Trish started explaining to her what it was.

“A tiny pokey stick, inside my finger?” Her eyes danced, delighted, right up until we started explaining that it really didn’t belong there. And it was going to keep hurting until we got it out.

She jerked her hand out of her mama’s grasp at that, eyes growing wide, and shook her head. “No,” she said. “It’ll be fine.” Then she started to back slowly away, like we were some kind of wild animals. I reached out a hand to calm her, and she turned and sprinted off down the hall, to hide in her room.

So Trish and I exchanged glances. I shrugged. We’d have to deal with it, but we didn’t have to deal with it right then, right? I was tired from a long day at work, and surely it would be a good idea to let the idea sink in a bit before we tried to press the girl on what had to be done. And she didn’t seem to be in a lot of pain….

So I left her playing in her room, left Trish washing the dishes, and I went back to my office to do some Consortium work. An hour or so later I came back to get a drink, and as I was walking toward the kitchen Trish called out a hi to me. Then she said, “Hey Annabelle, tell Dad about your splinter.”

I frowned, curious, and went to meet Annabelle who skipped right up to me, holding her finger proudly aloft. The bandaid was gone. So was the splinter.

“Oh wow,” I said. “Were you a brave girl for Mama? I’m proud of you.”

She shook her head, a big smile on her face. “Nope,” she said. “It’s just gone. I did it.”

I frowned deeper. “How?”

“My magic,” she said. “It even works on my fingers.”

And that was all the answer I got. Magic. It even works on her fingers.

That’s my girl.

On Writing Technique: Chasing Catastrophe

I started the week talking about writing 17,000 words in three days…and all the catastrophes that made it necessary in the first place. Then yesterday I talked about a new writing technique I’ve been studying in class that pushes a novel toward lots of conflict and catastrophe. Today I want to make the connection.

And there certainly is one. The only way I managed to get my words written at all was by applying those two techniques I talked about yesterday.

Inertia

As I mentioned, I’ve long been a proponent of conflict. I’ve preached here before about the Conflict Resolution Cycle. Teaching my dad to write, I told him, “You’ve got to find the conflict. You’ve got to put it in your story. The more conflict, the better.”

Looking at it now, that advice is…well, it’s not bad. But it’s clumsy. It’s blind. More conflict is good, yes, but it’s got to be deliberate. It’s got to be directed. And until a few weeks ago even I didn’t know how to direct it.

Using Deborah Chester’s scene structure gives it direction, though. It gives your conflict a boundary and a purpose. Conflict defines your scene. It exists within the scene, and it focuses unerringly on the point of the scene — the scene question.

When you write conflict like that, it creates inertia (the good kind). It gets your story moving and keeps it moving. That’s the whole point — it does that for the reader, which gets them all caught up in your story — but it does the same thing for you as the writer.

If you’re really invested in the conflict, if your protagonist and antagonist are really wrestling, then the stimulus and response should flow. Everything the antagonist does will automatically get a rise out of the protagonist. So you write down that response. And you’d better bet whatever snappy comeback the protagonist comes up with is going to get a response of its own.

That’s a powerful kind of inertia. When you fall into it, the scene writes itself (as they say). All you’ve got to do is go along for the ride.

Magnetic Force

There’s more to it, too. The other half of the scene structure is the closing catastrophe. If you know your scene is going to end in a major setback, you’ve got something to write to.

Way back when, I wrote a post about plot points — act breaks — and I encouraged you to figure out your story’s plot points because they have a kind of magnetic force to them. As you’re working your way up to them, knowing you’ve got to get there, they keep you on track. They pull you forward.

And they represent an inherent turning point, so you have to know the from and the to. As a result, you always know what you’re writing, and even after you get to the plot point, that magnetic force turns repulsive, pushing you down the to path until you can get close enough to the next plot point for it to start attracting.

To my surprise, as soon as I started trying to follow Deborah Chester’s advice for scene structure, I started experiencing that same effect within my scenes. The scene’s catastrophe began to exert that same sort of magnetic force, but it’s so much closer. In every scene in the book I found myself flying through the pages, pulled inexorably toward the catastrophe I knew was coming.

And as soon as it came crashing down on our poor, bewildered hero (ending the scene in the process), I had to take a moment to describe what it had done to him. That was still part of writing the catastrophe, really — exploring its effects — and suddenly I’d written two or three extra pages, and found myself already turning my attention toward the next scene.

Clarifying Your Scene List (Creative Writing Exercise)

The lovely Kelley, writing at a coffee shopThat last bit is a hint at what I mean when I say “Scene and Sequel,” but I’ll get into more detail about that next week. For now, it’s enough to know that focusing your conflict and chasing toward an inevitable catastrophe are powerful writing tools.

Or perhaps I should say “prewriting.” As I said, those two techniques made it possible for me to write an extraordinary number of words last week, but I was only able to achieve that effect because I’d done the preparation work in advance.

When we first started discussing the techniques in class, I had a little Eureka! moment. See, I’ve talked here before about several powerful types of prewriting documents, including a Mock Table of Contents, a Conflict Resolution Cycle Worksheet, and several others.

I always throw in the Detailed Scene List, but that one doesn’t have a big long post to back it up. It barely has a paragraph. That’s because I’ve never had a very precise definition of what exactly should go into a scene description. A sentence? A paragraph? A “complete thought”?

That’s changed now, though. I know. All you need to clearly define a scene is three sentences containing five pieces of information:

  • Who is the Scene Protagonist, and what does he want?
  • Who is the Scene Antagonist, and what does he want? (As a reminder, it should be in direct opposition to the protagonist’s goal.)
  • What’s the Catastrophe that ends the scene?

That’s it. Simple as that. Sitting in class, I immediately started scribbling some down to see how well it would work, and it was magical. My scenes came into focus, my plot snapped into place, and my characters became a lot stronger — without my ever writing a word of narrative.

Here are some samples scene descriptions from my upcoming fantasy novel (currently undergoing rewrites):

  • Daven wants the other boys to respect him. Coop wants to humiliate him. Coop reveals he’s been recruited to the Guard (which is Daven’s secret dream).
  • When the king’s soldier arrives to arrest Daven and picks a fight with him, Daven wants to survive. Othin wants to kill him. Daven wins the fight by a stroke of luck, but he makes a dangerous enemy.
  • When the king’s wizard shows up mysteriously and starts leading Daven away, Daven wants to know why Claighan is there. Claighan wants to evaluate the boy’s potential before committing to anything. He tells Daven the Guard will never accept him (and why).
  • Daven wants to know more before he commits to anything. Claighan wants to take him away quickly. Jemminor (Daven’s master) wants to keep him around. Claighan drags Daven away in a huff, at night.

That last one is going to be trouble. It’s got three characters (all in conflict, incidentally). That doesn’t mean it’s a bad scene, but laying everything out like this I can clearly see that it’s going to be more complicated to manage than the more straightforward scenes that come before. That’s incredibly valuable information.

It’s all incredibly valuable. That’s my default outlining method, going forward. It tells so much about the story, in such bite-sized snippets.

What do you think? Could you describe one of your own stories that way? Give it a try — whether it’s a couple scenes from one you’ve already finished, or a new way of thinking about scenes you still need to imagine for your WIP. Let me know if it benefits you as much as it did me.

On Writing Technique: Conflict and Catastrophe

Okay, I’ve been mentioning my Master of Professional Writing program left and right, but I want to say up front that full credit for the information in this week’s and next week’s posts goes to Deborah Chester. She’s the professor teaching my Writing the Novel class, and a lot of these ideas come straight out of her lectures.

Next week I’m going to talk to you about “Scene and Sequel,” a concept she first introduced me to back in my Category Fiction class last fall, and one I promised a blog post on way back then. To really get scene and sequel, though, you’ve got to understand her rules for conflict.

Trusting the Technique

Deborah Chester is all about rules-based writing. She likes to say, “Trust the technique.” She considers it the zen of writing. We all get into that swampy middle of the writing process (during NaNoWriMo, we call it “Week 2”), where we totally lose all faith in our stories and our writing ability in general.

Chester’s advice, when that happens, is to trust the technique. Learn it, master it, and when you can’t trust your own judgment, you can at least follow the black-and-white rules, and count on them to bring you safely out the other side.

I don’t want writing to be like that. I want it to be a mystical, inspired art. Somehow that makes me feel more special for getting to have stories. But even as I say that…I believe writing is like that. I believe in the rules. They’re the fundamental promise I made the day I started this blog.

And the story I told about my fantastic writing production even in the grips of la grippe last week…that was all about trusting the technique. That was all about having my ducks in a row well beforehand, and then following through a step-by-step process even when my brain wasn’t working. And it worked.

Setting Up the Scene

So…what are these rules? They’re manifold, but the ones that meant the most to me in my most recent writing escapade were conflict and catastrophe. I’ll start with conflict.

Per Chester, every scene (for a very specific definition of scene, which we’ll get to later) exists as a flurried exchange of stimulus and response (one character speaks or acts, and another character speaks or acts in response, which elicits its own response, and so on). And this stimulus and response is tightly focused around a single conflict. Ideally, it exists between only two characters.

One of these characters is the Scene Protagonist. Often, it’s also the Story Protagonist. (In my recent books, which only have one point-of-view, it’s always the Story Protagonist).

Regardless, the Scene Protagonist starts the scene with a clearly stated goal. There is something he wants — something that can be expressed in a straightforward yes or no question.

  • Will he subdue the villain in a fistfight?
  • Will he convince the police officer to go along with his daring plan?
  • Will he win her heart with a big romantic display?

That’s easy enough. It makes sense. But then the ironclad, black-and-white rules come slamming down. The corollary to the Scene Protagonist with his one, clearly-defined goal, is this:

Every scene has a Scene Antagonist whose goal is precisely the opposite of the Scene Protagonist’s.

That’s your conflict: directly opposing goals.

  • It’s the villain who wants to escape unscathed.
  • It’s the cop who wants to keep the hero from starting any trouble.
  • It’s the girl who would really prefer that this creep just left her alone.

Answering the Scene Question

And there’s a good reason I phrased the protagonist’s goals as yes/no questions. It simplifies the next step.

See…a story is all about progress toward a final goal. But, at the same time, we make that progress by raising the stakes. We make that progress by eliminating options. In other words, stories are kind of unique in that they achieve incredible, heartwrenching progress through the unlikely method of constant setback.

If every scene is built around a yes/no question (will the protagonist achieve his goal), the answer to the question is predetermined.

Unless it’s the very last scene in the book, the answer to the protagonist’s scene question is always “no.”

Simple as that. Well…not really, of course. We spent ninety minutes of lecture one day discussing the nuance. But that’s a fair approximation of it. And not just a “No” most of the time, but a “No, and furthermore….”

Chester’s rule is that every scene ends with a catastrophe. The end of every scene is big and devastating — devastating enough to raise the stakes, to propel the hero to try something he wasn’t willing to try before. Sticking with our quick little trio of examples:

  • The villain not only escapes, he knocks the hero unconscious and drags him off to his lair.
  • The cop decides the hero is a total loony and throws him in lockup overnight to cool off (risking everything).
  • The girl reveals she only agreed to meet with him at all as a chance to present the restraining order.

Catastrophe, on every page! It’s brutal. It’s so mean to these characters we love so much….

Oh, but it works. It works wonders. Come back tomorrow, and I’ll tell you more.

What I Learned About Writing This Week…from Whining, Wherefores, and Whatnots

Writercam catches Courtney showing up for work before her Muse does.

Whining

Two days ago, I sat with Becca in Aaron’s living room and bewailed to them the fact that I hadn’t yet decided on a topic for this week’s WILAWriTWe.

For her part, Becca was doing her job of working with Julie to choose the final image for my book’s cover art. So I can’t really blame her for not engaging with me in an impromptu brainstorming session. Aaron, on the other hand, was duly sympathetic to my plight — but he is also recovering from a horrid cold, and I think he was slightly ready for Becca and me to depart unto our respective abodes. 😉

So. That left me with no new WILAWriTWe ideas. But I figured I had another 33 hours before my post needed to be ready. Plenty of time to ponder writing-related wisdoms gleaned from life, the universe, and everything.

Two days later, dear inklings, I must admit to you: I still got nothin’.

Wherefores

You see, I’m still reading C.S. Friedman’s Black Sun Rising, which I WILAWriTWe’d about last week. I’m also reading purely “for fun” at this point, because my mind needs the escape of immersion into another world without analysis of that world’s construction. So for now, gleaning any lessons from Friedman’s novel is out.

And then there’s the rest of life. Usually, I could draw a great WILAWriTWe from TV shows or movies I’m watching, deep conversations I’m having, activities in which I’m engaging, tweets I’m reading, ad infinitum.

The thing is that this week, I can’t draw anything from any of that. I’m not watching any TV shows or movies; I’m not conversing a whole lot; and I’m sorta hibernating at home in spite of springtime gorgeousness outside. And though I’m definitely using Twitter like a madwoman, I’m not currently possessed of the presence of mind to draw any significant conclusions to share here.

Colors of Deception, my soon-to-be-released novel, is eating my brain.

Whatnots

I’m writing back cover copy. I’m putting together my author bio and choosing a biopic. I’m tweaking dialogue here and there based on the final feedback from my betas. I’m looking at final cover art images and getting squee-ish and resisting overloading my cover art team with my input. If I can keep my mouth shut, they can do their jobs.

If I’m not doing all of that, I’m thinking about Holly, my MC; her friends; their foibles and troubles; and whether or not this manuscript is actually as ready as I think it is.

Whew!

Aaron and I spend a lot of time here emphasizing that when you’re writing, you can’t wait for inspiration to strike. Nine times out of 10, it ain’t gonna. Even if you don’t have an official contract with somebody, you’ve got to write as though you have an official contract with somebody. You write whether you feel like it or not, because that’s your job.

Your Muse is not going to saunter in for work unless you show up first.

So that’s what I’m on about today, dear readers: showing up for work and just writing, even though I have no inspiration and 9/10 of my brain is stuck in the demon world of Saltmarch with hapless Holly.

I have no idea if this is going to be helpful to any of you or not. But it is what it is, y’know? Writing, no matter what form it takes, is glorious — but it is also a lot of hard work, and that is the truth.

And that, my dears, is WILAWriTWe. Again. 😉

On Writing Technique: 25,000 Words

I’m pursuing a Master of Professional Writing degree at the University of Oklahoma. This semester, I’m taking one of the program’s three keystone classes, “Writing the Novel.” It involves two lectures on writing technique every week, but the core of it is the semester project. Over the space of just four months (almost five), I’ have to write thef irst draft of a 50,000-word novel.

That’s where I have to pause and let you chuckle. Just four months? I do that every November!

I thought of it that way coming into the class. I even considered waiting until April and just writing the whole novel then. The professor complicated that a bit, though. Halfway through the semester, she wanted us to turn in the first half of the book. In other words, I had to provide 25,000 words of a new novel — consecutive, formatted in proper manuscript format, and printed out looseleaf — to my professor at 1:30 yesterday afternoon.

As you’ll recall, I spent the first six weeks of the semester rewriting and publishing another novel. During that time I did work in a bit of prewriting — even scribbled down a few thousand words of story — but at the beginning of Spring Break (ten days ago now), I had just a hair over 8,000 words in my manuscript.

Spring Break. It has a good sound to it, but it’s deceptive. I work a full-time job, after all, so most of the time freed up by my Spring Break (four or five hours down in Norman) just went into technical writing for the Federal Government.

Still, that left me ten days to write 17,000 words. That’s 1,700 words a day, which is barely more than the 1,667 needed to finish NaNoWriMo. And I do that year after year, even with the day job. I could do it. I could tear it up. I’m good at writing fast.

But then I caught a cold. Or a flu. Or something vile. It hit me hard the day before Spring Break started. It wasn’t exactly debilitating, but I play everything so close to the line anyway that once something started to trip me up at all…everything came crashing down.

I spent a weekend laid up, trying to rest and regain my strength, knowing I’d have to go back to work (and find writing time) once Monday rolled around. I slept away a Saturday. I missed church Sunday morning (usually one of my most prolific writing times), and spent the afternoon fighting to focus at all. I didn’t get a hundred word written all weekend.

Then Monday I got to work to find out my supervisor was going away on a ten-week leave of absence. Ten weeks. And this less than two months after another of the members of our four-person documentation team had quit unexpectedly. Chaos descended at work, and I waded into it with a sore throat, bleary eyes, and way too little sleep (thanks to the coughing all night).

We had a Consortium Time last Monday night, at my house, but I was barely there. I bailed less than an hour into it, leaving Courtney and Becca to talk storytelling with Trish while I tried vainly to pass out. I didn’t write a word.

Tuesday…I felt no better. And I got to work to find a new emergency, so I was coughing into my elbow and keeping my distance from coworkers even as I tracked them down in the halls to fight a Safety document through our approval process. By the end of the day I was exhausted, totally worn out…and six days away from my deadline, with the full 17,000 words still to write.

So I had a quick dinner with the family, then locked myself in the office with my laptop and a big bag of cough drops. I still couldn’t focus, but I made myself write anyway. I pounded out 6,000 words in one night, and then collapsed onto the futon and did my sad little impression of sleep.

Wednesday went much the same. I spent my lunch break curled up in the back seat of my car, out in the parking lot, trying to catch a quick nap. It didn’t work. I went home, skipped dinner, and then forced my way through the fight scene to end the night with another hard-won 4,000 words.

I didn’t understand the significance until I woke up the next morning. In two days, I’d written 10,000 words. That left just 7,000 more. Not a small number, but things were finally ticking. I could do this. I had four days to do less than I’d managed in two.

I was finally feeling better, too. I wasn’t well yet, but the fever was gone and the headaches were clearing.

I decided at the last moment to take the day off work and finally get myself well. I figured I could spend half the day sleeping, and the other half writing, and by Friday I could go back to work without a worry in the world.

At 10:30 in the morning my laptop died (overheating due to an exhaust fan failure) and all the king’s horses and all the king’s men couldn’t put it back together again. I almost cried. Really, truly.

I did get my rest, and I did feel better on Friday, but I still needed 7,000 words. I went into work, hoping maybe I could get something done on my work computer over my lunch break or something, but we had new emergencies. Closing time rolled around and I went home without a single new word written.

And I went home to a house full of in-laws. I’d like to play that up as another catastrophe, just because it makes the story better, but really they were a blessing. They helped Trish out a lot, after a week I’d spent too sick and distracted to contribute much, and since they were visiting everyone went out Saturday afternoon to a St. Patrick’s Day parade, which left me a whole huge house all quiet. Perfect writing time.

I spent it wrestling with my computer. And coughing. And finally I gave up in frustration and took a nap instead.

That’s how I woke up Sunday morning knowing I had no choice but to write 7,000 before I went to bed. And I still didn’t have a computer to do it. I came up with a plan — borrow the Home Theater PC from the TV in the living room, set it up like a PC on my computer desk, hook it up to a wireless receiver, and write like I did in the old days, pre-laptop.

So I did all that. I’m relatively savvy. I know how to do these things. And I happened to have half a dozen old wireless receivers tucked away in different places in my house. Hah! I spent half an hour setting up my workstation, and turned it on….

And the network connection didn’t work. I ended up having to hack the firmware on an old wireless router, which took me every bit of seven hours (plus a two hour break to watch the kids and grab some dinner). In between tests, waiting for resets, I scratched like mad in my trusty scribblebook, hoping I’d have enough words written when the network was finally available. Hoping it would finally be available. Hoping I’d have time to type them….

It was 9:30 when I finally pulled up Google Docs on the HTPC. I had 18 pages of hand-written story by then. I became a new kind of feverish, fingers flying while I transcribed, and it was just turning 11:00 when I finally got to the end of that 18th page.

And pulled up my word count.

23,517.

I wanted to cry. Really, truly. But I didn’t. I looked over at Trish, sleeping peacefully in our big comfy bed. I looked at the clock on my computer screen. I took a deep breath and let it out.

And then I wrote 2,000 more words on nothing but willpower. Less than an hour. I introduced one of the coolest characters I’ve ever written. I double-crossed my hero with his only friend in a foreign world. I laid a trap and I beat up a Dreamwarden and I turned a girl into a giant copper scales.

It’s not the most writing I’ve ever done in a day. It’s not the best writing I’ve ever done. But it’s the most victorious I’ve ever felt. 17,000 words in six days, the last 7,000 in three short hours.

I’m a superstar. No denying it. I did have help, though. Come back Thursday, and I’ll tell you a few of my newest tricks.

What I Learned About Writing This Week…from C. S. Friedman

Beta readers probably won’t comment on them. “Gamma” and “delta” readers (if you want to go that far) might find them perplexing but aren’t likely to express disapproval.

Editors, however, will tell you to cut them out.

Them? Ah, yes — I’m glad you asked.

We’re talking prologues, my dear inklings.

The Problem of Prologues

Should we have them? Or should we cast them upon the cleansing fires of editing and rewrites, never allowing them to mar another of our manuscripts again?

In all honesty, I have no idea whether or not an editor will tell you to cut a prologue from a manuscript. I guess it depends on the prologue (i.e. the quality of your writing) and the editor (i.e. professional or personal taste).

What I do know, however, is that as I’ve kept my ear more firmly plastered to the writerly ground over the last few years, I’ve heard louder and more frequent rumblings and grumblings against the infamous prologue.

You shouldn’t have a prologue. It distracts from the rest of the story.

The prologue in Mr. Famous Fantasy Writer’s novel is as long as a chapter. He should’ve just made it Chapter 1.

You’re using the prologue to tell backstory that you should weave into the actual story. So cut the prologue and start weaving!

And so forth.

Painful

All good points, and I agree with them. Prologues often do distract from the rest of the story, because they so often focus on characters that don’t appear in the rest of the novel. You get to the end of the book — and a day later, you randomly remember that there was a prologue. Thinking back on the ending and on the story as a whole, you have no idea how the prologue connected to the rest of it.

Or the prologue was 5,000 words long. If that’s how long the chapters are, why is the prologue there? Why isn’t it Chapter 1? If it has the form and the feel of a chapter, then it doesn’t deserve special set-apartness. Incorporate it into the story.

Me, I spent six years writing my high fantasy novel Triad — and for five of those years, the story possessed a prologue. Then Aaron got hold of it and pointed out that while my little prologue scene was well-crafted, fun, interesting, and endearing, it really bogged down the start of the real story.

“It would make a great short story submission to a fantasy magazine,” he said, “but it makes kind of a lousy prologue.”

By the time I called Triad complete, the well-crafted, interesting little prologue no longer existed as such. Its endearing story comes out in dialogue in Chapters 1 and 2, and the novel is the better for it.

So. No prologues for me. And no prologues for you, either! I’m glad we got that settled.

Pause!

Except.

I’m currently reading Black Sun Rising by C. S. Friedman.

She starts her novel off with a prologue. It’s a doozy, and I mean that in a good way. Also, it is creepy.

When I realized that the creepy I was reading was a prologue, I thought, “Meh.”

Here we go again. Yet another fantasy author with a pointless prologue penchant. Get to the main characters, please. I’d like to start the story.

Well, then Friedman starts the story. I got sucked in, started enjoying my reading experience, fell in love with the universe Friedman created, got introduced to the main bad guy, who’s totally charming but hostile to the male MC, not to mention that said bad guy is creepy–

Wait a minute. Where have I read this kind of creepy before?

Oh.

The prologue.

Okay, Ms. Friedman. I’m onto you. I see what you did there.

Pro-Prologue

1. Throughout the rest of the story, the author touches on things we read in the prologue. Sensations, emotions, atmosphere, events. Even suspicions that the reader’s mind forms. This prologue is no distraction, because its themes run like a vivid thread through the tapestry of the story.

2. Friedman keeps her prologue short. It’s only a few pages long. I just passed Chapter 30, which covers twenty-eight pages. The prologue definitely doesn’t look or read like the chapters.

3. Friedman uses her prologue to tell the story of how the bad guy — who is in the rest of the book!!! — becomes the bad guy. It’s not unnecessary backstory, because its vivid imagery and distinctive setting plant themselves in the reader’s mind. And those little seeds lie there, dormant, until the reader comes across Mr. Bad Guy several chapters into the story. At this point, the seeds start to grow, and the reader realizes that something worse is afoot than even the main characters know.

That tantalizing realization wouldn’t happen without the prologue.

Curses!

All right, all right. I give, already! I guess I’m not as staunchly anti-prologue as I thought I’d become. You can all have your prologues back — provided you do them well.

Aha! There’s the clincher, isn’t it? If we want our prologues to matter, if we want them to be valid and not get rewritten onto the editorial funeral pyre, we’ve got to write them well.

So, the rules still apply — and Friedman follows them. That’s why her prologue works.

And that’s WILAWriTWe!

On Publishing: Getting It Out There

This week I’m describing how Consortium Books makes books. In yesterday’s post I talked about the setup — acquisitions, editing, layout, and design. Today I want to talk about production and distribution.

Publishing

In the olden days, the  “publishing” bit involved taking an edited manuscript, typesetting it, offsetting it, then running tens of thousands of copies and slapping glue-smeared covers on them. These days, it involves downloading a file from one website and uploading it to another.

Well…not entirely. There’s still a “printing” phase, but that’s what CreateSpace is for. And there’s a lot more to that “downloading a file from one website” part than it may first appear.

The website in question is one I’ve mentioned here a time or two: BookMaker. It’s a custom, web-based program (written in Python) which my friend Toby wrote for the Consortium. As I said yesterday, it can take one of our project folders in Google Docs, read its contents, and then package them together into an e-Book.

An “e-Book” in this case might be either ePub format (for use on the Sony Reader, iPad, Kobo, Nook, etc.), or the AZW filetype of MobileRead’s mobi format (just for the Kindle).  So, yes, if I wanted to e-publish Ghost Targets: Restraint, all I’d have to do is open the BookMaker site in my browser, log in, and then click the “Download” link under ePub and it would be done.

But for it to make a clean copy, I’ve got to make sure all the files in the project folder are set up properly — otherwise BookMaker’s going to stumble over a misplaced apostrophe and the whole thing will come crashing down.

So that’s my job as the publisher. I do it during layout when I crawl back and forth the manuscript’s HTML code to make sure it still looks the way the writer wants, but it’s all going to validate to XHTML. I do it when I build the project folder in the first place and make sure all the files are properly named. I do it when I update the metadata file to include a link to the cover art image.

And, of course, Toby gets the largest share of the credit. He made this program out of nothing. Without BookMaker, we’d have thirty or forty hours of formatting work to do, minimum, just to get a passable e-Book out of a finished draft manuscript. With BookMaker, and with a little careful setup along the way (maybe an hour or two per project), it does end up as simple as “downloading a file from one website.”

Distribution

I’m not going to talk about the publishing process for print-on-demand e-Books, because that’s the least interesting part of the process. It’s the same thing we’ve all been doing for decades. I pull the copy off Google Docs and into a Word document, and then format it in Word until it’s page-perfect, and then print it to a PDF.

Either way, once the books’ files are made distribution is as simple as setting up project pages at CreateSpace and KDP, uploading them, and clicking “Publish.” I talked about those processes last week, so I won’t go into a bunch more detail here, except as it relates to Marketing and Promotion.

Marketing and Promotion

As I described in that article on KDP, the trick to successful indie e-publishing is hitting the Amazon bestseller lists. Some of the biggest names in indie publishing (don’t laugh, that’s a real thing) insist that paying for ads anywhere is a waste of time.

Amazon is ad space. It’s the most important ad space, and it’s free. The trick is to get that ad right, and everything else will take care of itself. So when we’re putting together a project page, we spend a lot of time designing the message the book’s Amazon product page is going to create.

And a lot of those elements actually get designed much earlier in the process. The most important ones are the book’s cover image (which has to be visually-striking, has to properly categorize the book to the right audience, and has to look good at thumbnail size), and the brief product description.

I already told you that our Director of Art, Becca, is responsible for cover art (and the amazing Amy Nickerson does the final cover design). We’ve also got Joshua Unruh acting as our Director of Marketing, so the product descriptions are his job.

He’s also responsible for the third critical element in hitting that bestseller-list snowball: product categories. Each book gets to be assigned two categories (out of dozens of potential options), and choosing those categories determines which bestseller lists the book is eligible for, and which audiences Amazon will market it to.

That can be a challenge — especially for a book like Gods Tomorrow, which has elements of a dozen major categories, but doesn’t really fit neatly into any one of them. The market requires it, though. As a publisher, our only option is to pick the two best-fit categories, and hope everyone else finds it through word-of-mouth.

There are other tricks, other parts of the process, and I’m sure other contributors that I’ve left out. For one, I’ve said almost nothing about the role of the author in this — but then, I spend another 51 weeks every year talking about that process. I figured the publishers deserved one week of dedicated time.

Still, let me know if I missed anything, or if I’ve raised any other questions. I’d be happy to answer them in the comments.

On Publishing: Making It Pretty

I started the week with the story of the evolution of Unstressed Syllables — which was significantly driven by the birth of Consortium Books — and ended that post with the promise that I’d tell you how Consortium Books does what it does.

I’m dividing that into two parts: “Making It Pretty” and “Getting It Out There.” That’s the publisher’s job, in a nutshell. And the process involves several steps and several incredibly talented people. I’ll go over all of them in order.

Acquisitions

The first step in any publisher’s process is acquisitions — bringing in projects to consider, and then rejecting all the sub-par submissions. Those two pieces tend to find an uneven balance, to the extent that, at most traditional publishing houses, this step would better be labeled “Rejections.”

And don’t get me wrong — an indie company with four volunteer staff members and a $0 annual operating budget isn’t going to beat any of the Bigs on throughput. The Consortium is different, though. We’re not looking to acquire a hit manuscript, package it up, and then sell it for millions (most of which we’d pass along to our shareholders).

The Consortium is a home for artists, so we’re going to do something publishing houses used to do in the dim and distant past — we’re going to train up our writers. As a result, our acquisitions process has more to do with recruitment of writers than solicitation of manuscripts.

Right now, our initial focus is getting my backlist and Courtney’s backlist published, so the acquisitions process is mostly a priority ranking. Which ones are most ready, and which ones can we get ready in time? That’s going to see three Ghost Targets novels on the market by the end of 2011, two of my high fantasy novels, and two of Courtney’s Christian fantasy.

We’re also working to ramp up our production speed, though, and as part of that we’re hoping to get Joshua Unruh‘s weird western published in late 2011, and Jessie Sanders’s young adult fantasy in early 2012.

So here’s the acquisitions process as it will be:

  • Courtney and/or I reviews a draft manuscript by one of our artists to decide if it’s ready for publication.
  • If it is, we figure out where to put it in the publishing schedule (we’ve already got it mostly filled out through mid-2013).
  • If not, we provide a detailed description of why, and send it back to the writer.

Of course, our company being what it is, “send it back to the writer” is usually going to mean a friendly lunch and a long chat on the topic. The job of our Master Writers is to teach the students how to write publishable books, so I see no reason for us to outright reject anything. We can send books back for rewrites, but that should always come along with specific, detailed feedback on why and what.

Editorial Review

Once a book is ready for publication, we set up a project folder for it in Google Docs. That includes

  • A blank “description” document (which will become the back-cover copy and the product description at Amazon)
  • A project metadata file (which we’ll fill with things like official title, series name, series volume number, ISBN(s), etc), and
  • Template files for the various bits of internal text (title page, copyright page, dedication, manuscript body, teaser, etc).

(You’ll see what happens to all those later in the process.)

And the very next step is to drop the novel manuscript into that folder for our editors to start reviewing. At the moment that’s Jessie Sanders, but we’re working on getting her some interns to help with the enormous amount of reviewing we anticipate come 2012. (And, y’know, to give back to the community. And to catch them young.)

Jessie gives the manuscript an intensive copy- and concept-edit — she checks the manuscript for story structure, characterization, plausibility, and at the same time she scans the lines for typos, poor word choice, and inconsistencies. Like most book publishers, we follow the Chicago Manual of Style, and Jessie’s the one who makes sure that happens.

She leaves all of the copyediting feedback inline, with color-coded highlights and sidebar comments throughout the document. Then once she’s done, she puts together a detailed concept report giving her overall opinion of the story and suggested changes. That all goes back to the writer, and once the writer’s had time to review it, the writer and editor get together for a meeting (which, again, is often a casual lunch or a Google chat, and could frequently be a dozen of them).

The writer and editor work through all the editorial changes right there in the Google Doc, and once they’re satisfied that everything necessary has been addressed, we’ll have a “final edits meeting” between editor (Jessie), author (Courtney, for instance), and publisher (me). We go over the final manuscript, discussing any major changes or sales elements that came up during the editing process, and especially any special layout or design requirements.

That last bit is important, because once the edit’s done, the book goes straight to layout and design.

Layout and Design

Layout and design is probably the most complicated part of our process. For one, we’ve got to take hundreds of pages of content files and get them all set up properly not just so they look right, but so they read right to an unforgiving, unintelligent machine. I’ll talk more about that in tomorrow’s post.

We also need to design several other elements. We need back-cover copy, so this is the stage when the author and editor get together with our Marketing Director (you know him as Joshua Unruh) to fill out that description document I mentioned before.

We’ll also need our art department (that one’s case-by-case, but we’re usually talking Julie and Carlos Velez for photography and Amy Nickerson for design) to come up with cover art. To make that possible our Director of Art, Becca Campbell, first reads the book, then meets with the author to design a cover image the author will love.

Then she conveys that information to the artists involved (in a meeting that the author almost always participates in).That usually gives us two or three weeks for the artists to come up with something to give the designer, and then the designer puts it all in the right format for our printers.

And then the book goes to publishing. But that’s tomorrow’s topic. See you then.

What I Learned About Writing This Week…from Getting Published

A few weeks ago, my WILAWritWe exposed to you all my fears about getting edited by a real honest-to-goodness professional editor. I also regaled you with my conclusion that the whole thing was well worth the terror and that it all came out well in the end.

I wrote the above paragraph to remind myself that, indeed, it did turn out all right, and my fears were unjustified.

You see, I’m facing the next step in the process, and it’s got me shakin’ in my knee-high, German-bought boots.

That Next Step’s A Doozy

The final edits are not yet complete; my manuscript is still dripping blood. But that’s a good thing, because every story must bleed before we can call it “done.” That, however, is another story and shall be told another time. (Cookies if you get the reference.)

In the meantime, I must needs multi-task, and the next task on the writerly agenda is the cover art.

Not wanting complete control over the creative process, I enlisted the help of Aaron, Becca, and Carlos and Julie. Together, we decided that the ideal image for the cover would be a scene that takes place in Saltmarch.

Saltmarch, my dear inklings, is where the demons live in the fantasy world I built for Colors of Deception. I won’t say much about it here and now, because I know you don’t want to listen to me talk about a story you haven’t read and cannot yet read. All you need to know is that Saltmarch is a bleak, barren wasteland made of — you guessed it — salt.

The photo you see above is one I took at Turner Falls in Oklahoma last October. The dead trees were perfect, the lighting was perfect, and the little tools in iPhoto were, for once, perfect. When I was done playing with the image, I had myself something that looked sort of like how I picture Saltmarch.

Before the Doozy

But, perfect lighting and tools notwithstanding, that photo is not perfect. It doesn’t truly represent my vision of Saltmarch, and it certainly doesn’t work as a book cover.

And thus came the Time of Brainstorming and the Era of Drawing Board. My team and I deliberated, doubted, and delineated. Eventually, we decided that the place for the perfect shot would be the Great Salt Plains State Park of Oklahoma.

Two days ago, Becca and I made a trip to the salt plains to scout out likely photo locations.

After the Doozy: Terror

It was an adventure, and we found some likely spots, but I won’t regale you with that tale. Right now, the adventure is beside the point. The point, my dear inklings, is that now my worries have set in.

What if it rains the day of our photoshoot?
What if our models cancel?
What if somebody gets sick?
What if we spend 2 1/2 hours getting to the location — and none of the shots are viable?
What if the cover art doesn’t look attractive to any potential readers?
What if the cover art looks back on a Kindle thumbnail?
What if the printing company can’t do a good printing of the image we choose?

These questions boil down to two what-ifs, burnt and sizzling at the bottom of the psychological cookpot:

What if absolutely nothing about this book publication goes the way it should?

What if this book publication doesn’t go at all?

The Doozy in Perspective

After Becca and I got back to Oklahoma City Monday night, I was weary in mind and body. I’d drunk from the creative pool nonstop all day, and the water was getting pretty low, lemme tell ya. I ended my day with a detailed, face-to-face report to Aaron — and then confessed to him everything I was getting so scared of.

He nodded. “That sounds normal.”

I expected him to say that — because I knew it was true. I just needed to hear it from somebody who’s been through it already. Especially at this point, when I’d exhausted my creative resources in one long day, I needed the reassurance of a success story. Aaron reminded me of his own struggles and concerns…and of how everything turned out all right in the end.

Just like it did with my getting edited.

In Colors of Deception, my characters face demons, both literally and metaphorically. I hope that we writers don’t have actual demons plaguing us (now that would make a great story…), but we certainly deal with more than our share of the metaphorical ones.

In our pursuit of the writing life, we will have triumphs and celebrations. We will rejoice with each other again and again. We will flourish and grow in the beauty of the creative life we’re privileged to live.

We’ll have our worries, too. We’ll have our frustrations and our fears. We’ll have those moments (sometimes weeks or months) of doubt. Those times of darkness are terribly difficult to leave behind us.

But we can and will leave them behind: for we are designed to do so, and we have each other, and along with our creativity, we’re gifted with every good resource we need for living out our dreams. We might need time and dedicated effort before we can uncover those resources…but they are there. They’re waiting for us to discover them.

Time, patience, support, and hard work. It boils down to a list no more complex than that.

It pretty much blasts my fears into oblivion. And that’s WILAWriTWe.

What about you?